Dialogue between religions cannot merely be dialogue between doctrines. As soon as religions are considered not only as abstract systems of beliefs but also as embodied practices of faith, their aesthetic dimension becomes prominent. Dialogue therefore involves the sphere of sensibility. How do believers of different faiths weave the fabric of religious experience? Through which senses, signs, and forms of signification and communication does it find expression? Furthermore, how can different religious aesthetic attitudes be encompassed in the same dialogue? This article does not answer these questions through theoretical investigation. Rather, it offers an example of religious ‘aesthetic hospitality’. In one of his poems devoted to Ha¯fez, Goethe invents a metaphor that opens a space of dialogue between Christian and Islamic aesthetic sensibilities. This metaphor, based on the Christian tradition of acheiropoietai (not-made-with-hands) images of Jesus’ face, allows Goethe to bridge two religious semiotics: the Christian one, rather centred on the visibility of the sacred, and the Islamic one, rather centred on its invisibility. Through historical contextualization and semiotic analysis, the article retraces the sources of the Christian imaginaire of acheiropoietai images of Jesus in order to pinpoint the semantic efficacy of Goethe’s metaphor. In conclusion, quoting and examining a poem by Ha¯fez, the article suggests that Goethe’s offer of ‘aesthetic hospitality’ is actually a reciprocation, since it responds to a similar offer made to Christianity by his ‘Oriental twin’ in one of his poems several centuries earlier.

The sacred, (in)visibility, and communication: an inter-religious dialogue between Goethe and Hāfez

LEONE, Massimo
2010-01-01

Abstract

Dialogue between religions cannot merely be dialogue between doctrines. As soon as religions are considered not only as abstract systems of beliefs but also as embodied practices of faith, their aesthetic dimension becomes prominent. Dialogue therefore involves the sphere of sensibility. How do believers of different faiths weave the fabric of religious experience? Through which senses, signs, and forms of signification and communication does it find expression? Furthermore, how can different religious aesthetic attitudes be encompassed in the same dialogue? This article does not answer these questions through theoretical investigation. Rather, it offers an example of religious ‘aesthetic hospitality’. In one of his poems devoted to Ha¯fez, Goethe invents a metaphor that opens a space of dialogue between Christian and Islamic aesthetic sensibilities. This metaphor, based on the Christian tradition of acheiropoietai (not-made-with-hands) images of Jesus’ face, allows Goethe to bridge two religious semiotics: the Christian one, rather centred on the visibility of the sacred, and the Islamic one, rather centred on its invisibility. Through historical contextualization and semiotic analysis, the article retraces the sources of the Christian imaginaire of acheiropoietai images of Jesus in order to pinpoint the semantic efficacy of Goethe’s metaphor. In conclusion, quoting and examining a poem by Ha¯fez, the article suggests that Goethe’s offer of ‘aesthetic hospitality’ is actually a reciprocation, since it responds to a similar offer made to Christianity by his ‘Oriental twin’ in one of his poems several centuries earlier.
2010
21
4
373
384
http://www.tandf.co.uk/journals/carfax/09596410.html
inter-religious dialogue; aesthetics; semiotics; Goethe; Ha¯fez; acheiropoietai images
LEONE; M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Massimo Leone 2010 - The Sacred, Invisibility, and Communication.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 999.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
999.71 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/78728
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact