This critical note presents an assessment of some theoretical frameworks concerning, first and foremost, the threefold model of argumentation, negotiation and dialogue. The author discusses whether it is possible to bargain over beliefs, following the proposal of Raùl Calvo at the recent XIII Italian-Spanish congress for analytical philosophy of law. Moreover, Mindus takes into account the current debate on Hilary Putnam’s The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and the thesis of so-called entangled objects in law, by discussing the critical outlook offered by José Juan Moreso and Gaetano Carcaterra.

Deliberare, negoziare e argomentare sulle incerte sorti della legge di Hume

MINDUS, Patricia Maria
2008-01-01

Abstract

This critical note presents an assessment of some theoretical frameworks concerning, first and foremost, the threefold model of argumentation, negotiation and dialogue. The author discusses whether it is possible to bargain over beliefs, following the proposal of Raùl Calvo at the recent XIII Italian-Spanish congress for analytical philosophy of law. Moreover, Mindus takes into account the current debate on Hilary Putnam’s The Collapse of the Fact/Value Dichotomy and the thesis of so-called entangled objects in law, by discussing the critical outlook offered by José Juan Moreso and Gaetano Carcaterra.
2008
1
145
155
P.M. Mindus
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/78924
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact