BACKGROUND: Primary debulking surgery before initiation of chemotherapy has been the standard of care for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma, fallopian-tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma to primary debulking surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy or to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery (so-called interval debulking surgery). RESULTS: Of the 670 patients randomly assigned to a study treatment, 632 (94.3%) were eligible and started the treatment. The majority of these patients had extensive stage IIIC or IV disease at primary debulking surgery (metastatic lesions that were larger than 5 cm in diameter in 74.5% of patients and larger than 10 cm in 61.6%). The largest residual tumor was 1 cm or less in diameter in 41.6% of patients after primary debulking and in 80.6% of patients after interval debulking. Postoperative rates of adverse effects and mortality tended to be higher after primary debulking than after interval debulking. The hazard ratio for death (intention-to-treat analysis) in the group assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking, as compared with the group assigned to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy, was 0.98 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.13; P=0.01 for noninferiority), and the hazard ratio for progressive disease was 1.01 (90% CI, 0.89 to 1.15). Complete resection of all macroscopic disease (at primary or interval surgery) was the strongest independent variable in predicting overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery was not inferior to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy as a treatment option for patients with bulky stage IIIC or IV ovarian carcinoma in this study. Complete resection of all macroscopic disease, whether performed as primary treatment or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, remains the objective whenever cytoreductive surgery is performed. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003636.)

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy or primary surgery in stage IIIC or IV ovarian cancer.

ZOLA, Paolo;
2010-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Primary debulking surgery before initiation of chemotherapy has been the standard of care for patients with advanced ovarian cancer. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with stage IIIC or IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma, fallopian-tube carcinoma, or primary peritoneal carcinoma to primary debulking surgery followed by platinum-based chemotherapy or to neoadjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy followed by debulking surgery (so-called interval debulking surgery). RESULTS: Of the 670 patients randomly assigned to a study treatment, 632 (94.3%) were eligible and started the treatment. The majority of these patients had extensive stage IIIC or IV disease at primary debulking surgery (metastatic lesions that were larger than 5 cm in diameter in 74.5% of patients and larger than 10 cm in 61.6%). The largest residual tumor was 1 cm or less in diameter in 41.6% of patients after primary debulking and in 80.6% of patients after interval debulking. Postoperative rates of adverse effects and mortality tended to be higher after primary debulking than after interval debulking. The hazard ratio for death (intention-to-treat analysis) in the group assigned to neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking, as compared with the group assigned to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy, was 0.98 (90% confidence interval [CI], 0.84 to 1.13; P=0.01 for noninferiority), and the hazard ratio for progressive disease was 1.01 (90% CI, 0.89 to 1.15). Complete resection of all macroscopic disease (at primary or interval surgery) was the strongest independent variable in predicting overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery was not inferior to primary debulking surgery followed by chemotherapy as a treatment option for patients with bulky stage IIIC or IV ovarian carcinoma in this study. Complete resection of all macroscopic disease, whether performed as primary treatment or after neoadjuvant chemotherapy, remains the objective whenever cytoreductive surgery is performed. (Funded by the National Cancer Institute; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00003636.)
2010
363
10
943
953
ovarian cancer neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Vergote I; Tropé CG; Amant F; Kristensen GB; Ehlen T; Johnson N; Verheijen RH; van der Burg ME; Lacave AJ; Panici PB; Kenter GG; Casado A; Mendiola C; Coens C; Verleye L; Stuart GC; Pecorelli S; Reed NS; Angioli R; Bentley J; Berteloot P; Bessette P; Boman K; Buist M; Chan K; Chan S; Coronado Martín P; Counsell R; Cruickshank DJ; Davis J; De Greve J; De Oliveira CF; De Valk B; Dittrich C; Elit L; Favalli G; Floquet A; Gauthier P; Gerdin E; Ghatage P; Gilby E; Gleeson N; Gotlieb W; Green JA; Grimshaw R; Heywood M; Hirsch V; Hoekman K; Honkoop A; Hoskins P; Kannisto P; Kaern J; Katsaros D; Kieser K; Kristeller TV; Leblanc E; Ledermann J; Leunen K; Lotocki R; Maggino T; Marth C; Martin L; Massuger L; Miller D; Mosgaard B; Mota F; Neven P; Nooij M; Nordal R; Nordin A; Ottevanger PB; Papadopoulos A; Petru E; Plante M; Popadiuk C; Provencher D; Redman C; Roozendaal KJ; Rustin G; Sadozye AH; Sandvei R; Seoane JM; Sereni MI; Sert B; Siddiqui N; Speiser P; Tholander B; Tognon G; Trimbos B; Trudeau M; Van Baal M; Van Doorn HC; Van der Velden J; Van Eygen K; Vermorken JB; Vidart Aragon JA; Wensveen CW; Zola P; Anastosopoulou A; Bethe U; Dehaes K; Demeester A; Demonty G; De Heusch E; De Rouck M; Giurgea L; Hoctin-Boes G; Teodorovic I; Ven K; Van Luijk I; Bacon M; Eisenhauer E.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
vergote_neoadjiuv_2010.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 341.38 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
341.38 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/80625
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 559
  • Scopus 1957
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact