Putnam and Kripke argue that from the direct reference theory of natural-kind terms stem «startling consequences for the theory of necessary truth», namely the existence of (non-trivial) examples of metaphysically necessary but conceptually contingent truths. I aim to show that the matter is not so plain, at least with regard to species-terms. To be precise, it is not possible to derive such consequences merely from the direct reference theory without presupposing a certain kind of essentialism (that I will call «genetic essentialism»). If this is correct, then not only is essentialism a premise rather then a consequence of Putnam’s view. It is, moreover, a premise whose plausibility calls for empirical verification, and such a verification is far from being available.
Le tigri di Putnam
CASETTA, ELENA
2007-01-01
Abstract
Putnam and Kripke argue that from the direct reference theory of natural-kind terms stem «startling consequences for the theory of necessary truth», namely the existence of (non-trivial) examples of metaphysically necessary but conceptually contingent truths. I aim to show that the matter is not so plain, at least with regard to species-terms. To be precise, it is not possible to derive such consequences merely from the direct reference theory without presupposing a certain kind of essentialism (that I will call «genetic essentialism»). If this is correct, then not only is essentialism a premise rather then a consequence of Putnam’s view. It is, moreover, a premise whose plausibility calls for empirical verification, and such a verification is far from being available.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
