BACKGROUND: Oral verrucous carcinomas (OVCs) are characterized by better prognosis than oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs). Because chromosomal instability (CIN) in solid tumors is indicative of prognosis, this study investigated whether OVCs and OSCCs were characterized by differences in CIN biomarkers. METHODS: Fresh or frozen multiple tissue samples were submitted to high-resolution DNA flow cytometry (hr DNA-FCM). RESULTS: DNA aneuploid sublines were detected in 6 of 9 OVCs (66.7%) and in 20 of 25 OSCCs (80.0%). Multiple DNA aneuploid sublines were observed, respectively, in 2 of 6 (33.3%) DNA aneuploid OVCs and in 14 of 20 (70%) DNA aneuploid OSCCs (P = .163). OVCs were mainly characterized by DNA Index (DI) values in the near-diploid region (DI≠1 and DI < 1.4), whereas aneuploid OSCCs carried most frequently multiple aneuploid sublines with high DI values (DI ≥ 1.4). DNA near-diploid and high aneuploid sublines were, respectively, 87.5% and 12.5% for the OVCs versus 30% and 70% for the OSCCs (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Present data suggest that OVCs are characterized by a lower degree of CIN and tumor heterogeneity than OSCCs, such that they appear as "frozen" in an early stage of DNA near-diploid aneuploidy, as previously observed for oral preneoplastic lesions. These DI characteristics, which can easily be obtained by hr DNA-FCM, appear to reflect the well-known differences in aggressiveness and prognosis of OVCs and OSCCs.

Distinctive chromosomal instability patterns in oral verrucous and squamous cell carcinomas detected by high-resolution DNA flow cytometry.

PENTENERO, Monica;MARINO, ROBERTO;BROCCOLETTI, Roberto;GANDOLFO, Sergio;
2011-01-01

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Oral verrucous carcinomas (OVCs) are characterized by better prognosis than oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs). Because chromosomal instability (CIN) in solid tumors is indicative of prognosis, this study investigated whether OVCs and OSCCs were characterized by differences in CIN biomarkers. METHODS: Fresh or frozen multiple tissue samples were submitted to high-resolution DNA flow cytometry (hr DNA-FCM). RESULTS: DNA aneuploid sublines were detected in 6 of 9 OVCs (66.7%) and in 20 of 25 OSCCs (80.0%). Multiple DNA aneuploid sublines were observed, respectively, in 2 of 6 (33.3%) DNA aneuploid OVCs and in 14 of 20 (70%) DNA aneuploid OSCCs (P = .163). OVCs were mainly characterized by DNA Index (DI) values in the near-diploid region (DI≠1 and DI < 1.4), whereas aneuploid OSCCs carried most frequently multiple aneuploid sublines with high DI values (DI ≥ 1.4). DNA near-diploid and high aneuploid sublines were, respectively, 87.5% and 12.5% for the OVCs versus 30% and 70% for the OSCCs (P = .004). CONCLUSIONS: Present data suggest that OVCs are characterized by a lower degree of CIN and tumor heterogeneity than OSCCs, such that they appear as "frozen" in an early stage of DNA near-diploid aneuploidy, as previously observed for oral preneoplastic lesions. These DI characteristics, which can easily be obtained by hr DNA-FCM, appear to reflect the well-known differences in aggressiveness and prognosis of OVCs and OSCCs.
2011
117
5052
5057
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cncr.26126/abstract?systemMessage=Wiley+Online+Library+will+be+disrupted+21+May+from+10-12+BST+for+monthly+maintenance
oral verrucous carcinoma; oral squamous cell carcinoma; chromosomal instability; DNA aneuploidy; flow cytometry
Pentenero M; Donadini A; Di Nallo E; Maffei M; Marino R; Familiari U; Broccoletti R; Castagnola P; Gandolfo S; Giaretti W.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
565338.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 175.17 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
175.17 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/87583
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact