Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is often explained as the differential equilibrium between stabilizing survival selection and directional sexual/fecundity selection on the body size of males and females. Provided that survival selection is similar in both sexes, female-biased SSD is thought to occur when fecundity selection on female body size is stronger than sexual selection on male body size. However, in animals with indeterminate growth, body size depends on several life-history traits, thus, to understand why SSD has evolved, one should understand how it arises. We investigate SSD in the Tyrrhenian tree frog, Hyla sarda, by describing sexual dimorphism in age and growth and by assessing how body size affects their reproductive success. Females are 16% larger than males because they mature 1 year later, live 1 year longer and reach a larger asymptotic body size. Furthermore, body size correlates positively with female fecundity, but not with male mating success. These results suggest that SSD arises from differential optimal trade-offs between the expected number of reproductive episodes (which decreases with prolonging growth) and the expected success in each reproductive episode (which increases with prolonging growth).
Sexual size dimorphism in the Tyrrhenian tree frog: a life-history perspective
CADEDDU, GIORGIA;GIACOMA, Cristina;CASTELLANO, Sergio
2012-01-01
Abstract
Sexual size dimorphism (SSD) is often explained as the differential equilibrium between stabilizing survival selection and directional sexual/fecundity selection on the body size of males and females. Provided that survival selection is similar in both sexes, female-biased SSD is thought to occur when fecundity selection on female body size is stronger than sexual selection on male body size. However, in animals with indeterminate growth, body size depends on several life-history traits, thus, to understand why SSD has evolved, one should understand how it arises. We investigate SSD in the Tyrrhenian tree frog, Hyla sarda, by describing sexual dimorphism in age and growth and by assessing how body size affects their reproductive success. Females are 16% larger than males because they mature 1 year later, live 1 year longer and reach a larger asymptotic body size. Furthermore, body size correlates positively with female fecundity, but not with male mating success. These results suggest that SSD arises from differential optimal trade-offs between the expected number of reproductive episodes (which decreases with prolonging growth) and the expected success in each reproductive episode (which increases with prolonging growth).File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Cadeddu et al_JournalZool2012.pdf
Open Access dal 01/01/2014
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
618.14 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
618.14 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
Cadeddu_et_al-2012-editoriale.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
361.92 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
361.92 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.