This paper discusses ways of improving the management of cultural heritage sites, focusing on new forms of involvement and public participation based on public preferences’ elicitation. The problem of an appropriate level of democratic participation needs an integrated approach, capable of bridging the practice of urban design, conservation of the built environment and decision-making support system. This paper reports results from a survey using conjoint choice approach questions to elicit people’s preferences for cultural heritage management strategies for an outstanding world heritage site: the Temples of Paestum, in Italy. The potential of the above-mentioned methodologies’ within the current cultural heritage research scenario is also discussed.

Preference heterogeneity in relation to museum services

COLOMBINO, Ugo;
2009-01-01

Abstract

This paper discusses ways of improving the management of cultural heritage sites, focusing on new forms of involvement and public participation based on public preferences’ elicitation. The problem of an appropriate level of democratic participation needs an integrated approach, capable of bridging the practice of urban design, conservation of the built environment and decision-making support system. This paper reports results from a survey using conjoint choice approach questions to elicit people’s preferences for cultural heritage management strategies for an outstanding world heritage site: the Temples of Paestum, in Italy. The potential of the above-mentioned methodologies’ within the current cultural heritage research scenario is also discussed.
2009
15
381
396
Cultural goods; Museum Services; Preference Heterogeneity; Mixed Logit; Stated Prerences
U. COLOMBINO; A. NESE
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/94708
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 16
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact