To characterize the control of jaw-clenching forces by means of a simple force-matching exercise.Seventeen healthy subjects, provided with visual feedback of the exerted force, carried out a unilateral force-matching exercise requiring developing and maintaining for 7 seconds a jaw-clenching force at 10\%, 30\%, 50\%, and 70\% of the maximum voluntary contraction. The task was repeated three times in each of two sessions. Motor performance was assessed, for both left and right sides, by different indices quantifying mean distance (MD), offset error (OE), and standard deviation (SD). Their dependence on force intensity, side, and time was assessed by ANOVA.All error indices increased with the intensity of contraction in absolute terms. After normalization with respect to force level, the average performance in the second session was characterized by MD of 8.1\% ± 2.6, OE 4.8\% ± 2.9, and SD 12.7\% ± 6.7 (mean ± standard deviation). Assessment of performance exhibited good reliability for all indices (intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 74\% to 88\%). The motor performance improved with repetition (P < .01), varied considerably between subjects, was not correlated with gender or age (P > .05) but was highly correlated between left and right side (P < .01).The adopted approach is adequate to provide for an objective assessment of individual force control, although the presence of a learning phase must be taken into account.

Control of jaw-clenching forces in dentate subjects.

ROATTA, Silvestro
2011-01-01

Abstract

To characterize the control of jaw-clenching forces by means of a simple force-matching exercise.Seventeen healthy subjects, provided with visual feedback of the exerted force, carried out a unilateral force-matching exercise requiring developing and maintaining for 7 seconds a jaw-clenching force at 10\%, 30\%, 50\%, and 70\% of the maximum voluntary contraction. The task was repeated three times in each of two sessions. Motor performance was assessed, for both left and right sides, by different indices quantifying mean distance (MD), offset error (OE), and standard deviation (SD). Their dependence on force intensity, side, and time was assessed by ANOVA.All error indices increased with the intensity of contraction in absolute terms. After normalization with respect to force level, the average performance in the second session was characterized by MD of 8.1\% ± 2.6, OE 4.8\% ± 2.9, and SD 12.7\% ± 6.7 (mean ± standard deviation). Assessment of performance exhibited good reliability for all indices (intraclass correlation coefficient ranging from 74\% to 88\%). The motor performance improved with repetition (P < .01), varied considerably between subjects, was not correlated with gender or age (P > .05) but was highly correlated between left and right side (P < .01).The adopted approach is adequate to provide for an objective assessment of individual force control, although the presence of a learning phase must be taken into account.
2011
25
250
260
Adult, Biofeedback; Psychology, Bite Force, Dental Stress Analysis, Female, Humans, Isometric Contraction, Male, Masseter Muscle; physiology, Psychomotor Performance, Transducers, Young Adult
M. Testa;M. Rolando;S. Roatta
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2011 Testa et al. J Orof Pain.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 849.4 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
849.4 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
2011 Deroga JOP.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Deroga
Tipo di file: DEROGA (OBBLIGATORIO ALLEGARE FILE CON MOTIVAZIONE)
Dimensione 62.95 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
62.95 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/96983
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact