Considerable barriers still prevent paediatricians from successfully using information retrieval technology.To verify whether the assistance of biomedical librarians significantly improves the outcomes of searches performed by paediatricians in biomedical databases using real-life clinical scenarios.In a controlled trial at a paediatric teaching hospital, nine residents and interns were randomly allocated to an assisted search group and nine to a non-assisted (control) group. Each participant searched PubMed and other online sources, performing pre-determined tasks including the formulation of a clinical question, retrieval and selection of bibliographic records. In the assisted group, participants were supported by a librarian with ≥5 years of experience. The primary outcome was the success of search sessions, scored against a specific assessment tool.The median score of the assisted group was 73.6 points interquartile range (IQR = 13.4) vs. 50.4 (IQR = 17.1) of the control group. The difference between median values in the results was 23.2 points (95\% CI 4.8-33.2), in favour of the assisted group (P-value, Mann-Whitney U test: 0.013).The study has found quantitative evidence of a significant difference in search performance between paediatric residents or interns assisted by a librarian and those searching the literature alone.

Effectiveness of bibliographic searches performed by paediatric residents and interns assisted by librarians. A randomised controlled trial

GARDOIS, Paolo;COLOMBI, Nicoletta;DEPLANO, Annamaria;LINGUA, Carla;VILLANACCI, Maria Cristina;PIGA, Antonio Giulio
2011-01-01

Abstract

Considerable barriers still prevent paediatricians from successfully using information retrieval technology.To verify whether the assistance of biomedical librarians significantly improves the outcomes of searches performed by paediatricians in biomedical databases using real-life clinical scenarios.In a controlled trial at a paediatric teaching hospital, nine residents and interns were randomly allocated to an assisted search group and nine to a non-assisted (control) group. Each participant searched PubMed and other online sources, performing pre-determined tasks including the formulation of a clinical question, retrieval and selection of bibliographic records. In the assisted group, participants were supported by a librarian with ≥5 years of experience. The primary outcome was the success of search sessions, scored against a specific assessment tool.The median score of the assisted group was 73.6 points interquartile range (IQR = 13.4) vs. 50.4 (IQR = 17.1) of the control group. The difference between median values in the results was 23.2 points (95\% CI 4.8-33.2), in favour of the assisted group (P-value, Mann-Whitney U test: 0.013).The study has found quantitative evidence of a significant difference in search performance between paediatric residents or interns assisted by a librarian and those searching the literature alone.
2011
28
273
284
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2011.00957.x
P. Gardois; R. Calabrese; N. Colombi; A. Deplano; C. Lingua; F. Longo; M. C. Villanacci; R. Miniero; A. Piga
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Gardois P-2011-bibliographic searches.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 255.56 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
255.56 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Effectiveness_postprint_4aperto.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 259.97 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
259.97 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/101714
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 20
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact