Anaerobic digestion is a promising option for recycling agricultural by-products and some organic wastes. While both agricultural by-products and wastes have no direct commercial value, their management is both complicated and costly. One option to simplify by-product management and reduce the costs associated with biogas plant feedstock is to substitute dedicated crops with vegetal by-products. Given that the chemical composition of some of these by-products can differ considerably from more typical biogas plant feedstock (such as maize silage), more complete knowledge of these alternatives to produce environmentally friendly energy is warranted. To this end, batch trials under mesophilic conditions were conducted to evaluate the potential biogas yield of many agricultural by-products: maize stalks, rice chaff, wheat straw, kiwi fruit, onions, and two expired organic waste products (dairy and dry bread) from the retail mass-market. Among the considered biomasses, the highest methane producer was the expired dairy product mixture, which yielded 554 lNCH4 kg−1 volatile solids (VS). Maize stalks and wheat straw produced the lowest yields of 214 and 285 lNCH4 kg−1VS, respectively. An assessment of the biogas and methane yields of each biomass was also undertaken to account for the specific chemical composition of each biomass as it can affect the anaerobic digestion operating system. Finally, the total Italian green energy production that might be derived from feeding all these biomasses to a biogas digester was estimated, in order to understand its potential impact.

An Analysis of the Energy Potential of Anaerobic Digestion of Agricultural By-Products and Organic Waste

MENARDO, SIMONA;BALSARI, Paolo
2012-01-01

Abstract

Anaerobic digestion is a promising option for recycling agricultural by-products and some organic wastes. While both agricultural by-products and wastes have no direct commercial value, their management is both complicated and costly. One option to simplify by-product management and reduce the costs associated with biogas plant feedstock is to substitute dedicated crops with vegetal by-products. Given that the chemical composition of some of these by-products can differ considerably from more typical biogas plant feedstock (such as maize silage), more complete knowledge of these alternatives to produce environmentally friendly energy is warranted. To this end, batch trials under mesophilic conditions were conducted to evaluate the potential biogas yield of many agricultural by-products: maize stalks, rice chaff, wheat straw, kiwi fruit, onions, and two expired organic waste products (dairy and dry bread) from the retail mass-market. Among the considered biomasses, the highest methane producer was the expired dairy product mixture, which yielded 554 lNCH4 kg−1 volatile solids (VS). Maize stalks and wheat straw produced the lowest yields of 214 and 285 lNCH4 kg−1VS, respectively. An assessment of the biogas and methane yields of each biomass was also undertaken to account for the specific chemical composition of each biomass as it can affect the anaerobic digestion operating system. Finally, the total Italian green energy production that might be derived from feeding all these biomasses to a biogas digester was estimated, in order to understand its potential impact.
2012
5
759
767
Anaerobic digestion; Agricultural by-products; Organic waste; Biogas; Energy potential
Menardo Simona; Balsari Paolo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
paper by-products.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 405.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
405.48 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Balsari_byproducts.pdf

Open Access dal 02/10/2014

Descrizione: open access By products
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 717.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
717.08 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/123838
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 50
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 38
social impact