This essay examines the idea of luck in its possible relation with distributive justice. It then presents Dworkin’s distinction between “brute luck” and “option luck.” In light of Rawls’ A Theory of Justice and Williams’ notion of equality from a human point of view, the essay analyzes the notion of merit in its constitutive elements –“genetic lotteries,” “social capital,” historical and cultural context, and individual initiative – in order to bring out an unconventional configuration of the concept.

Fortuna, caso e giustizia distributiva

PANIZZA, Giulio
2014-01-01

Abstract

This essay examines the idea of luck in its possible relation with distributive justice. It then presents Dworkin’s distinction between “brute luck” and “option luck.” In light of Rawls’ A Theory of Justice and Williams’ notion of equality from a human point of view, the essay analyzes the notion of merit in its constitutive elements –“genetic lotteries,” “social capital,” historical and cultural context, and individual initiative – in order to bring out an unconventional configuration of the concept.
2014
12
439
445
http://www.spaziofilosofico.it/numero-12/5090/numero-12-fortuna/
G. Panizza
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Panizza_Fortuna_caso.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 151.54 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
151.54 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/149828
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact