This essay examines the idea of luck in its possible relation with distributive justice. It then presents Dworkin’s distinction between “brute luck” and “option luck.” In light of Rawls’ A Theory of Justice and Williams’ notion of equality from a human point of view, the essay analyzes the notion of merit in its constitutive elements –“genetic lotteries,” “social capital,” historical and cultural context, and individual initiative – in order to bring out an unconventional configuration of the concept.
Fortuna, caso e giustizia distributiva
PANIZZA, Giulio
2014-01-01
Abstract
This essay examines the idea of luck in its possible relation with distributive justice. It then presents Dworkin’s distinction between “brute luck” and “option luck.” In light of Rawls’ A Theory of Justice and Williams’ notion of equality from a human point of view, the essay analyzes the notion of merit in its constitutive elements –“genetic lotteries,” “social capital,” historical and cultural context, and individual initiative – in order to bring out an unconventional configuration of the concept.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Panizza_Fortuna_caso.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
151.54 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
151.54 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.