Following the assumptions of the model theory, we argue that moral conflicts may arise because of conflicts between norms and values for judging an action as morally ‘right’ or ‘wrong’, and that they are dealt with through reasoning. In four experiments we invited adult participants to evaluate scenarios describing moral or immoral actions. Our results confirm the predictions deriving from our assumptions: given a moral or immoral scenario, the manipulation of the propositions which refer to norms and values results in a scenario eliciting a moral conflict (Experiment 1); when invited to create conflict versions from no-conflict versions of moral or immoral scenarios, individuals manipulate the propositions in the scenario which describe norms and values rather than emotional factors (Experiment 2); the evaluation of conflict scenarios takes longer than the evaluation of no-conflict scenarios (Experiment 3), and this is because conflict scenarios involve more deliberative reasoning (Experiment 4). We discuss our results in relation to competing theories of moral judgments.

Reasoning in moral conflicts

BUCCIARELLI, Monica;DANIELE, MARGHERITA
2015-01-01

Abstract

Following the assumptions of the model theory, we argue that moral conflicts may arise because of conflicts between norms and values for judging an action as morally ‘right’ or ‘wrong’, and that they are dealt with through reasoning. In four experiments we invited adult participants to evaluate scenarios describing moral or immoral actions. Our results confirm the predictions deriving from our assumptions: given a moral or immoral scenario, the manipulation of the propositions which refer to norms and values results in a scenario eliciting a moral conflict (Experiment 1); when invited to create conflict versions from no-conflict versions of moral or immoral scenarios, individuals manipulate the propositions in the scenario which describe norms and values rather than emotional factors (Experiment 2); the evaluation of conflict scenarios takes longer than the evaluation of no-conflict scenarios (Experiment 3), and this is because conflict scenarios involve more deliberative reasoning (Experiment 4). We discuss our results in relation to competing theories of moral judgments.
2015
21
3
265
294
moral judgments; moral conflicts; moral reasoning; intuitions; deliberative reasoning
Bucciarelli M; Daniele M
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Reasoning in moral conflicts_Versione dell'autore.pdf

Open Access dal 02/09/2016

Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 269.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
269.99 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
BUCCIARELLI2015Reasoning in moral conflicts.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 454.07 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
454.07 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1506326
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 15
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 14
social impact