1. Dung beetles are key contributors to a suite of ecosystem services. Understanding the factors that dictate their distributions is a necessary step towards preventing negative impacts of biodiversity loss. 2. We analysed Alpine dung beetle communities along altitudinal gradients to assess how different components of the community, defined in terms of nesting strategy (dung-ovipositing Aphodiidae [DOAs], soil-ovipositing Aphodiidae [SOAs] and two paracoprid [PAR] groups, Geotrupidae and Scarabaeidae) and parameters relevant to dung removal rates (species richness, total biomass and functional diversity), are distributed, and to identify to which environmental factors they respond. 3. Species richness declined with altitude. There was no significant variation in functional diversity, or total biomass in relation to altitude. There were significant variations when considered by nesting group: DOA species richness and biomass decreased, SOA biomass increased, and Geotrupidae biomass showed a non-linear trend, as altitude increased. 4. Functional diversity and total species richness were positively related to vegetation cover. DOA species richness was highest in forest and scrub, SOA species richness was highest in grassland and PAR species richness was lowest in rocky areas. 5. Dung beetle species show different trends in species richness and biomass depending on nesting strategy. Management to promote the dung beetle community should include maintenance of a mosaic of habitat types. Given the likely importance of species richness and biomass to ecosystem functioning, and the complimentary effect of different dung beetle groups, such a strategy may protect and enhance the ecosystem services that Alpine dung beetles provide.

Nesting strategies affect altitudinal distribution and habitat use in Alpine dung beetle communities

CHAMBERLAIN, Daniel Edward
First
;
TOCCO, CLAUDIA;MAMMOLA, STEFANO;PALESTRINI, Claudia
Co-last
;
ROLANDO, Antonio
Co-last
2015-01-01

Abstract

1. Dung beetles are key contributors to a suite of ecosystem services. Understanding the factors that dictate their distributions is a necessary step towards preventing negative impacts of biodiversity loss. 2. We analysed Alpine dung beetle communities along altitudinal gradients to assess how different components of the community, defined in terms of nesting strategy (dung-ovipositing Aphodiidae [DOAs], soil-ovipositing Aphodiidae [SOAs] and two paracoprid [PAR] groups, Geotrupidae and Scarabaeidae) and parameters relevant to dung removal rates (species richness, total biomass and functional diversity), are distributed, and to identify to which environmental factors they respond. 3. Species richness declined with altitude. There was no significant variation in functional diversity, or total biomass in relation to altitude. There were significant variations when considered by nesting group: DOA species richness and biomass decreased, SOA biomass increased, and Geotrupidae biomass showed a non-linear trend, as altitude increased. 4. Functional diversity and total species richness were positively related to vegetation cover. DOA species richness was highest in forest and scrub, SOA species richness was highest in grassland and PAR species richness was lowest in rocky areas. 5. Dung beetle species show different trends in species richness and biomass depending on nesting strategy. Management to promote the dung beetle community should include maintenance of a mosaic of habitat types. Given the likely importance of species richness and biomass to ecosystem functioning, and the complimentary effect of different dung beetle groups, such a strategy may protect and enhance the ecosystem services that Alpine dung beetles provide.
2015
40
4
372
380
Aphodiidae; Dung removal; Ecosystem services; Endocoprid; Functional diversity; Geotrupidae; Onthophagini; Paracoprid
D.E. Chamberlain; C. Tocco; A. Longoni; S. Mammola; C. Palestrini; A Rolando
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Chamberlain et al. 2015 EE.docx

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 1.87 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.87 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Chamberlain et al. 2015 EE.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 1.41 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.41 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1508339
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 14
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact