Purpose The goal of the study was to evaluate the repair of chondral lesions treated with combined autologous adult/allogenic juvenile cartilage fragments, compared with isolated adult and isolated juvenile cartilage fragments. Methods Fifty-eight adult (>16 week old) and five juvenile (<6 week old) New Zealand White female rabbits were used. A large osteochondral defect was created in the center of the femoral trochlea of adult rabbits. The rabbits were divided in four groups: Group 1 = untreated defects (controls); Group 2 = adult cartilage fragments; Group 3 = juvenile cartilage fragments; and Group 4 = adult + juvenile cartilage fragments. Killings were performed at 3 and 6 months. The defects were evaluated with ICRS macroscopic score, modified O’Driscoll score, and Collagen type II immunostaining. Results At 3 months, Group 4 performed better than Group 1, in terms of modified O’Driscoll score (p = 0.001) and Collagen type II immunostaining (p = 0.015). At 6 months, Group 4 showed higher modified O’Driscoll score (p = 0.003) and Collagen type II immunostaining score (p < 0.001) than Group 1. Histologically, also Group 3 performed better than Group 1 (p = 0.03), and Group 4 performed better than Group 2 (p = 0.004). Conclusions Mixing adult and juvenile cartilage fragments improved cartilage repair in a rabbit model. In the clinical setting, a new “one-stage” procedure combining the two cartilage sources can be hypothesized, with the advantages of improved chondral repair and large defect coverage, because of the use of an off-the-shelf juvenile allograft. Further studies on larger animals and clinical trials are required to confirm these results.

The use of autologous adult, allogenic juvenile, and combined juvenile–adult cartilage fragments for the repair of chondral defects

Bonasia, Davide Edoardo;ROSSI, Roberto;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Purpose The goal of the study was to evaluate the repair of chondral lesions treated with combined autologous adult/allogenic juvenile cartilage fragments, compared with isolated adult and isolated juvenile cartilage fragments. Methods Fifty-eight adult (>16 week old) and five juvenile (<6 week old) New Zealand White female rabbits were used. A large osteochondral defect was created in the center of the femoral trochlea of adult rabbits. The rabbits were divided in four groups: Group 1 = untreated defects (controls); Group 2 = adult cartilage fragments; Group 3 = juvenile cartilage fragments; and Group 4 = adult + juvenile cartilage fragments. Killings were performed at 3 and 6 months. The defects were evaluated with ICRS macroscopic score, modified O’Driscoll score, and Collagen type II immunostaining. Results At 3 months, Group 4 performed better than Group 1, in terms of modified O’Driscoll score (p = 0.001) and Collagen type II immunostaining (p = 0.015). At 6 months, Group 4 showed higher modified O’Driscoll score (p = 0.003) and Collagen type II immunostaining score (p < 0.001) than Group 1. Histologically, also Group 3 performed better than Group 1 (p = 0.03), and Group 4 performed better than Group 2 (p = 0.004). Conclusions Mixing adult and juvenile cartilage fragments improved cartilage repair in a rabbit model. In the clinical setting, a new “one-stage” procedure combining the two cartilage sources can be hypothesized, with the advantages of improved chondral repair and large defect coverage, because of the use of an off-the-shelf juvenile allograft. Further studies on larger animals and clinical trials are required to confirm these results.
2016
24
12
3988
3996
http://link.springer.de/link/service/journals/00167/index.htm
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4531112/
Adult; Cartilage repair; Chondral fragments; In vivo; Juvenile; Rabbit; Orthopedics and Sports Medicine; Surgery
Bonasia, Davide Edoardo; Martin, James A.; Marmotti, Antonio; Kurriger, Gail L.; Lehman, Abigail D.; Rossi, Roberto; Amendola, Annunziato
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
The use of autologous adult.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.14 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.14 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1523282
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 9
  • Scopus 21
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact