The performance of a method is generally measured by an assessment of the errors between the method’s results and a set of reference data. The prediction uncertainty is a measure of the confidence that can be attached to a method’s prediction. Its estimation is based on the random part of the errors not explained by reference data uncertainty, which implies an evaluation of the systematic component(s) of the errors. As the predictions of most density functional approximations (DFA) present systematic errors, the standard performance statistics, such as the mean of the absolute errors (MAE or MUE), cannot be directly used to infer prediction uncertainty. We investigate here an a posteriori calibration method to estimate the prediction uncertainty of DFAs for properties of solids. A linear model is shown to be adequate to address the systematic trend in the errors. The applicability of this approach to modest-size reference sets (28 systems) is evaluated for the prediction of band gaps, bulk moduli, and lattice constants with a wide panel of DFAs.

Prediction uncertainty of density functional approximations for properties of crystals with cubic symmetry

CIVALLERI, Bartolomeo;
2015-01-01

Abstract

The performance of a method is generally measured by an assessment of the errors between the method’s results and a set of reference data. The prediction uncertainty is a measure of the confidence that can be attached to a method’s prediction. Its estimation is based on the random part of the errors not explained by reference data uncertainty, which implies an evaluation of the systematic component(s) of the errors. As the predictions of most density functional approximations (DFA) present systematic errors, the standard performance statistics, such as the mean of the absolute errors (MAE or MUE), cannot be directly used to infer prediction uncertainty. We investigate here an a posteriori calibration method to estimate the prediction uncertainty of DFAs for properties of solids. A linear model is shown to be adequate to address the systematic trend in the errors. The applicability of this approach to modest-size reference sets (28 systems) is evaluated for the prediction of band gaps, bulk moduli, and lattice constants with a wide panel of DFAs.
2015
119
21
5288
5304
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/jp509980w
Physical and Theoretical Chemistry
Pernot, Pascal; Civalleri, Bartolomeo; Presti, Davide; Savin, Andreas
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
dft_pernot2015_jp509980w.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 2.46 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.46 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
dft_pernot2015_jp509980w_supp.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: DATASET
Dimensione 171.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
171.99 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri
pernot-final-twocol_aperto.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 35.06 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
35.06 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1558402
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 5
  • Scopus 80
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 74
social impact