Abstract BACKGROUND: How to deal with melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) origin is a debated topic in the literature. OBJECTIVE: We performed a worldwide survey to inquire what clinical and investigational workup is performed as well as the physicians' perception of this disease. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent via mail to clinicians involved in melanoma care from December 2015 to April 2016 using the International Dermoscopy Society website. RESULTS: 119 physicians from 47 different countries answered the questionnaire. The most reported examination was skin examination followed by CT and/or PET scans. All the participants declared asking about previous excisions of skin lesions with 81% of them asking for a histopathological slide review of previous biopsies. Half of the participants checked for a possible vitiligo phenomenon that may explain regression of the primary lesion. BRAF, cKIT, and GNAQ mutations were screened by 32% of participants. The majority of participants (76%) applied the same treatment protocols for MUP as patients with known primary melanomas of the same AJCC stage. CONCLUSION: Strong heterogeneity was found between physicians dealing with MUP. Thus, a consensus document should be strongly encouraged.

Unknown Primary Melanoma: Worldwide Survey on Clinical Management.

RIBERO, Simone
Co-first
;
QUAGLINO, Pietro;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Abstract BACKGROUND: How to deal with melanoma of unknown primary (MUP) origin is a debated topic in the literature. OBJECTIVE: We performed a worldwide survey to inquire what clinical and investigational workup is performed as well as the physicians' perception of this disease. METHODS: A questionnaire was sent via mail to clinicians involved in melanoma care from December 2015 to April 2016 using the International Dermoscopy Society website. RESULTS: 119 physicians from 47 different countries answered the questionnaire. The most reported examination was skin examination followed by CT and/or PET scans. All the participants declared asking about previous excisions of skin lesions with 81% of them asking for a histopathological slide review of previous biopsies. Half of the participants checked for a possible vitiligo phenomenon that may explain regression of the primary lesion. BRAF, cKIT, and GNAQ mutations were screened by 32% of participants. The majority of participants (76%) applied the same treatment protocols for MUP as patients with known primary melanomas of the same AJCC stage. CONCLUSION: Strong heterogeneity was found between physicians dealing with MUP. Thus, a consensus document should be strongly encouraged.
2016
232
6
704
707
Management; Melanoma; Survey; Unknown primary
Ribero, S; Pampena, R; Bataille, V; Moscarella, E; Thomas, L; Quaglino, P; Potenza, C; Van Akkooi, Acj; Testori, A; Nathan, P; Puig, S; Zalaudek, I; A...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
quaglino survey dermatology pregnancy.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: articolo principale
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 88.99 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
88.99 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1640895
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 16
social impact