Each culture develops a specific semiotic ideology of catastrophe and reparation. Comparing and contrasting them reveals continuities and discontinuities. The traditional Japanese aesthetics resolves the problem of the anxiety for a potential catastrophe by focusing on the fullness of immanence. In the West, on the contrary, for which the idea of future is essential, the fatalistic approach of the Greco-Roman civilization is replaced by the Christian idea of the miracle. Investigating the iconography of the broken glass and its saintly reparations is a way to come to terms with the aesthetic and semiotic consequences of the transition.
Semiótica de la reparación
LEONE, Massimo
2017-01-01
Abstract
Each culture develops a specific semiotic ideology of catastrophe and reparation. Comparing and contrasting them reveals continuities and discontinuities. The traditional Japanese aesthetics resolves the problem of the anxiety for a potential catastrophe by focusing on the fullness of immanence. In the West, on the contrary, for which the idea of future is essential, the fatalistic approach of the Greco-Roman civilization is replaced by the Christian idea of the miracle. Investigating the iconography of the broken glass and its saintly reparations is a way to come to terms with the aesthetic and semiotic consequences of the transition.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
Massimo Leone 2017 - Semiótica de la reparación.pdf
Accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
6.05 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
6.05 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.