Background and Objective Clinical practice guidelines recommend antipsychotic monotherapy, including oral and longacting formulations, in the treatment of schizophrenia. This open-label, randomized, controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability in patients with schizophrenia of once-monthly long-acting paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) compared with oral paliperidone extended release (ER), with a particular focus on satisfaction, subjective well-being, and service engagement. Methods Seventy-two consecutive outpatients with schizophrenia (DSM-5) were randomly assigned for 6 months to: (1) PP1M (50–150 mg equivalent) or (2) paliperidone ER (6–12 mg/day). Participants were assessed at baseline and after 6 months with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM); the Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics Scale (SWN-K); the Service Engagement Scale (SES); the Clinical Global Impression–Schizophrenia (CGI–SCH); and the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) score. ANOVA repeated measures was performed. Intention-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was conducted. Results We found a significant within-subjects effect (trial duration) for all rating scale except for cognitive symptoms and the TSQM domain “side effects”. A significant effect between subjects (treatment modality) was found for the CGI negative symptoms, the TSQM domains “overall satisfaction” and “convenience,” and the SES. There were seven drop-outs (9.7%): twi due to hyperprolactinemia and five for lack of compliance. Conclusions Significant differences between the two formulations were found. PP1M was superior to paliperidone ER on global treatment satisfaction and convenience, on service engagement, and in reducing negative symptoms. The trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) with the code: ACTRN12618001113246.

Effects on Satisfaction and Service Engagement of Paliperidone Palmitate Compared with Oral Paliperidone in Patients with Schizophrenia: An Open Label Randomized Controlled Trial

Paola Bozzatello
Co-first
;
Silvio Bellino
Co-first
;
Irene Mancini;Luisa Sandei;Paola Rocca
Last
2019-01-01

Abstract

Background and Objective Clinical practice guidelines recommend antipsychotic monotherapy, including oral and longacting formulations, in the treatment of schizophrenia. This open-label, randomized, controlled trial aimed to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability in patients with schizophrenia of once-monthly long-acting paliperidone palmitate (PP1M) compared with oral paliperidone extended release (ER), with a particular focus on satisfaction, subjective well-being, and service engagement. Methods Seventy-two consecutive outpatients with schizophrenia (DSM-5) were randomly assigned for 6 months to: (1) PP1M (50–150 mg equivalent) or (2) paliperidone ER (6–12 mg/day). Participants were assessed at baseline and after 6 months with the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM); the Subjective Well-being under Neuroleptics Scale (SWN-K); the Service Engagement Scale (SES); the Clinical Global Impression–Schizophrenia (CGI–SCH); and the Personal and Social Performance (PSP) score. ANOVA repeated measures was performed. Intention-to-treat analysis with last observation carried forward was conducted. Results We found a significant within-subjects effect (trial duration) for all rating scale except for cognitive symptoms and the TSQM domain “side effects”. A significant effect between subjects (treatment modality) was found for the CGI negative symptoms, the TSQM domains “overall satisfaction” and “convenience,” and the SES. There were seven drop-outs (9.7%): twi due to hyperprolactinemia and five for lack of compliance. Conclusions Significant differences between the two formulations were found. PP1M was superior to paliperidone ER on global treatment satisfaction and convenience, on service engagement, and in reducing negative symptoms. The trial was registered in the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (ANZCTR) with the code: ACTRN12618001113246.
2019
39
2
169
178
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40261-018-0734-1
Paola Bozzatello, Silvio Bellino, Irene Mancini, Luisa Sandei, Enrico Zanalda, Paola Rocca
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Bozzatello, Bellino, et al. Effects on satisfaction and service engagement of PP. Clin Drug Invest 2019.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.1 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.1 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Bozzatello, Bellino et al. Effects on satisfaction and service engagement of PP. Clin Drug Invest 2019. OA.pdf

Open Access dal 07/12/2019

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 604.46 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
604.46 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1684993
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 11
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 11
social impact