Accurate prediction of protein stability changes upon single-site variations (ΔΔG) is important for protein design, as well as for our understanding of the mechanisms of genetic diseases. The performance of high-throughput computational methods to this end is evaluated mostly based on the Pearson correlation coefficient between predicted and observed data, assuming that the upper bound would be 1 (perfect correlation). However, the performance of these predictors can be limited by the distribution and noise of the experimental data. Here we estimate, for the first time, a theoretical upper-bound to the ΔΔG prediction performances imposed by the intrinsic structure of currently available ΔΔG data.

A natural upper bound to the accuracy of predicting protein stability changes upon mutations

Fariselli, Piero
Last
2019-01-01

Abstract

Accurate prediction of protein stability changes upon single-site variations (ΔΔG) is important for protein design, as well as for our understanding of the mechanisms of genetic diseases. The performance of high-throughput computational methods to this end is evaluated mostly based on the Pearson correlation coefficient between predicted and observed data, assuming that the upper bound would be 1 (perfect correlation). However, the performance of these predictors can be limited by the distribution and noise of the experimental data. Here we estimate, for the first time, a theoretical upper-bound to the ΔΔG prediction performances imposed by the intrinsic structure of currently available ΔΔG data.
2019
35
9
1513-1517
1517
Montanucci, Ludovica; Martelli, Pier Luigi; Ben-Tal, Nir; Fariselli, Piero
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
UpperBoundArxiv.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione 686.48 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
686.48 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1702387
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 17
  • Scopus 31
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 31
social impact