Background: It is increasingly acknowledged that the outcomes of medical treatments are influenced by the context of the clinical encounter through the mechanisms of the placebo effect. The phenomenon of placebo analgesia might be exploited to maximize the efficacy of neurorehabilitation treatments. Since its intensity varies across neurological disorders, the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation (ICCP) summarized the studies on this field to provide guidance on its use. Methods: A review of the existing reviews and meta-analyses was performed to assess the magnitude of the placebo effect in disorders that may undergo neurorehabilitation treatment. The search was performed on Pubmed using placebo, pain, and the names of neurological disorders as keywords. Methodological quality was assessed using a pre-existing checklist. Data about the magnitude of the placebo effect were extracted from the included reviews and were commented in a narrative form. Results: 11 articles were included in this review. Placebo treatments showed weak effects in central neuropathic pain (pain reduction from 0.44 to 0.66 on a 0–10 scale) and moderate effects in postherpetic neuralgia (1.16), in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (1.45), and in pain associated to HIV (1.82). Moderate effects were also found on pain due to fibromyalgia and migraine; only weak short-term effects were found in complex regional pain syndrome. Confounding variables might have influenced these results. Clinical implications: These estimates should be interpreted with caution, but underscore that the placebo effect can be exploited in neurorehabilitation programs. It is not necessary to conceal its use from the patient. Knowledge of placebo mechanisms can be used to shape the doctor–patient relationship, to reduce the use of analgesic drugs and to train the patient to become an active agent of the therapy.

What is the role of the placebo effect for pain relief in neurorehabilitation? Clinical implications from the Italian consensus conference on pain in neurorehabilitation

Tesio V.;Castelli L.;Torta R.;Capodaglio P.;Scarpina F.;Priano L.;Mauro A.;Benedetti F.;Calvo A.;Chio A.;Ieraci V.;Manera U.;
2018-01-01

Abstract

Background: It is increasingly acknowledged that the outcomes of medical treatments are influenced by the context of the clinical encounter through the mechanisms of the placebo effect. The phenomenon of placebo analgesia might be exploited to maximize the efficacy of neurorehabilitation treatments. Since its intensity varies across neurological disorders, the Italian Consensus Conference on Pain in Neurorehabilitation (ICCP) summarized the studies on this field to provide guidance on its use. Methods: A review of the existing reviews and meta-analyses was performed to assess the magnitude of the placebo effect in disorders that may undergo neurorehabilitation treatment. The search was performed on Pubmed using placebo, pain, and the names of neurological disorders as keywords. Methodological quality was assessed using a pre-existing checklist. Data about the magnitude of the placebo effect were extracted from the included reviews and were commented in a narrative form. Results: 11 articles were included in this review. Placebo treatments showed weak effects in central neuropathic pain (pain reduction from 0.44 to 0.66 on a 0–10 scale) and moderate effects in postherpetic neuralgia (1.16), in diabetic peripheral neuropathy (1.45), and in pain associated to HIV (1.82). Moderate effects were also found on pain due to fibromyalgia and migraine; only weak short-term effects were found in complex regional pain syndrome. Confounding variables might have influenced these results. Clinical implications: These estimates should be interpreted with caution, but underscore that the placebo effect can be exploited in neurorehabilitation programs. It is not necessary to conceal its use from the patient. Knowledge of placebo mechanisms can be used to shape the doctor–patient relationship, to reduce the use of analgesic drugs and to train the patient to become an active agent of the therapy.
2018
9
MAY, 310
1
12
https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fneur.2018.00310/full
Clinical psychology; Consensus conference; Health psychology; Neurorehabilitation; Pain; Placebo; Placebo effect
Castelnuovo G.; Giusti E.M.; Manzoni G.M.; Saviola D.; Gabrielli S.; Lacerenza M.; Pietrabissa G.; Cattivelli R.; Maria Spatola C.A.; Rossi A.; Varallo G.; Novelli M.; Villa V.; Luzzati F.; Cottini A.; Lai C.; Volpato E.; Cavalera C.; Pagnini F.; Tesio V.; Castelli L.; Tavola M.; Torta R.; Arreghini M.; Zanini L.; Brunani A.; Seitanidis I.; Ventura G.; Capodaglio P.; D'Aniello G.E.; Scarpina F.; Brioschi A.; Bigoni M.; Priano L.; Mauro A.; Riva G.; Di Lernia D.; Repetto C.; Regalia C.; Molinari E.; Notaro P.; Paolucci S.; Sandrini G.; Simpson S.; Wiederhold B.K.; Gaudio S.; Jackson J.B.; Tamburin S.; Benedetti F.; Agostini M.; Alfonsi E.; Aloisi A.M.; Alvisi E.; Aprile I.; Armando M.; Avenali M.; Azicnuda E.; Barale F.; Bartolo M.; Bergamaschi R.; Berlangieri M.; Berlincioni V.; Berliocchi L.; Berra E.; Berto G.; Bonadiman S.; Bonazza S.; Bressi F.; Brugnera A.; Brunelli S.; Buzzi M.G.; Cacciatori C.; Calvo A.; Cantarella C.; Caraceni A.; Carone R.; Carraro E.; Casale R.; Castellazzi P.; Castino A.; Cerbo R.; Chio A.; Ciotti C.; Cisari C.; Coraci D.; Dalla Toffola E.; Defazio G.; De Icco R.; Del Carro U.; Dell'Isola A.; De Tanti A.; D'Ippolito M.; Fazzi E.; Ferrari A.; Ferrari S.; Ferraro F.; Formaglio F.; Formisano R.; Franzoni S.; Gajofatto F.; Gandolfi M.; Gardella B.; Geppetti P.; Giammo A.; Gimigliano R.; Greco E.; Ieraci V.; Invernizzi M.; Jacopetti M.; La Cesa S.; Lobba D.; Magrinelli F.; Mandrini S.; Manera U.; Marchettini P.; Marchioni E.; Mariotto S.; Martinuzzi A.; Masciullo M.; Mezzarobba S.; Miotti D.; Modenese A.; Molinari M.; Monaco S.; Morone G.; Nappi R.; Negrini S.; Pace A.; Padua L.; Pagliano E.; Palmerini V.; Pazzaglia C.; Pecchioli C.; Picelli A.; Porro C.A.; Porru D.; Romano M.; Roncari L.; Rosa R.; Saccavini M.; Sacerdote P.; Schenone A.; Schweiger V.; Scivoletto G.; Smania N.; Solaro C.; Spallone V.; Springhetti I.; Tassorelli C.; Tinazzi M.; Togni R.; Torre M.; Traballesi M.; Tramontano M.; Truini A.; Tugnoli V.; Turolla A.; Vallies G.; Verzini E.; Vottero M.; Zerbinati P.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2018_review What is the role of the placebo_Front neurol 09-00310_EO.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo principale - Review
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 392.42 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
392.42 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1721306
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 13
  • Scopus 45
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 24
social impact