The ordering of international contracts has a natural inclination to break free from national systems and create a sort of lingua franca for trade law. This has not prevented international sales, i.e. the typical model of cross-borders exchanges, from finding their main source in the ‘United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods’ (CISG): a lex indeed, but incomplete and open to derogations, which does not hinder but supports the establishment of a global lex mercatoria. And with the contemporary crisis of European Private Law, the CISG gains ground, both as to the number of ratifying countries and to its ability of giving rise to transnational case-law. In Italy, the CISG celebrates its thirtieth birthday and time has come for a ‘life review’. Just to use a motto: little case-law but good. Whatever reason lies behind such scarcity of case-law, its quality is surely high. After a few initial uncertainties, our decisions appear learned, compliant with autonomous interpretation and attentive to foreign precedents. For instance, in dealing with international good faith, the formation of contract, the reasonable time for the notice of defects, our courts have substantially achieved the founding fathers’ ideals: uniformity, flexibility, filtration, practicability. But it is commonplace that the importance of the CISG goes far beyond its being formally in force. In fact it plays the role of a model-legislation. It has been the source of inspiration for new regulations, in Europe and elsewhere – for all, Directive 1999/44/EC on the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees –, it guided the so-called soft law, it served as a first draft of the Common European Sales Law (CESL) and, even before, of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). In a nutshell, it has become a cultural paradigm in the scholarly debate and has found there its paramount ground for legitimacy. Here comes that studying Italian precedents on the CISG – which are after all national case-law – also means studying how our domestic system is capable of opening the door to universally recognised contents and values.
Thirty Years of CISG: International Sales, 'Italian Style'
Ferrante
2019-01-01
Abstract
The ordering of international contracts has a natural inclination to break free from national systems and create a sort of lingua franca for trade law. This has not prevented international sales, i.e. the typical model of cross-borders exchanges, from finding their main source in the ‘United Nations Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods’ (CISG): a lex indeed, but incomplete and open to derogations, which does not hinder but supports the establishment of a global lex mercatoria. And with the contemporary crisis of European Private Law, the CISG gains ground, both as to the number of ratifying countries and to its ability of giving rise to transnational case-law. In Italy, the CISG celebrates its thirtieth birthday and time has come for a ‘life review’. Just to use a motto: little case-law but good. Whatever reason lies behind such scarcity of case-law, its quality is surely high. After a few initial uncertainties, our decisions appear learned, compliant with autonomous interpretation and attentive to foreign precedents. For instance, in dealing with international good faith, the formation of contract, the reasonable time for the notice of defects, our courts have substantially achieved the founding fathers’ ideals: uniformity, flexibility, filtration, practicability. But it is commonplace that the importance of the CISG goes far beyond its being formally in force. In fact it plays the role of a model-legislation. It has been the source of inspiration for new regulations, in Europe and elsewhere – for all, Directive 1999/44/EC on the sale of consumer goods and associated guarantees –, it guided the so-called soft law, it served as a first draft of the Common European Sales Law (CESL) and, even before, of the Draft Common Frame of Reference (DCFR). In a nutshell, it has become a cultural paradigm in the scholarly debate and has found there its paramount ground for legitimacy. Here comes that studying Italian precedents on the CISG – which are after all national case-law – also means studying how our domestic system is capable of opening the door to universally recognised contents and values.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
87-ferrante (pubblicato).pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
489.31 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
489.31 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.