During cancer therapy, tumor heterogeneity can drive the evolution of multiple tumor subclones harboring unique resistance mechanisms in an individual patient1–3. Previous case reports and small case series have suggested that liquid biopsy (specifically, cell-free DNA (cfDNA)) may better capture the heterogeneity of acquired resistance4–8. However, the effectiveness of cfDNA versus standard single-lesion tumor biopsies has not been directly compared in larger-scale prospective cohorts of patients following progression on targeted therapy. Here, in a prospective cohort of 42 patients with molecularly defined gastrointestinal cancers and acquired resistance to targeted therapy, direct comparison of postprogression cfDNA versus tumor biopsy revealed that cfDNA more frequently identified clinically relevant resistance alterations and multiple resistance mechanisms, detecting resistance alterations not found in the matched tumor biopsy in 78% of cases. Whole-exome sequencing of serial cfDNA, tumor biopsies and rapid autopsy specimens elucidated substantial geographic and evolutionary differences across lesions. Our data suggest that acquired resistance is frequently characterized by profound tumor heterogeneity, and that the emergence of multiple resistance alterations in an individual patient may represent the ‘rule’ rather than the ‘exception’. These findings have profound therapeutic implications and highlight the potential advantages of cfDNA over tissue biopsy in the setting of acquired resistance.

Liquid versus tissue biopsy for detecting acquired resistance and tumor heterogeneity in gastrointestinal cancers

Siravegna G.;Bardelli A.;
2019-01-01

Abstract

During cancer therapy, tumor heterogeneity can drive the evolution of multiple tumor subclones harboring unique resistance mechanisms in an individual patient1–3. Previous case reports and small case series have suggested that liquid biopsy (specifically, cell-free DNA (cfDNA)) may better capture the heterogeneity of acquired resistance4–8. However, the effectiveness of cfDNA versus standard single-lesion tumor biopsies has not been directly compared in larger-scale prospective cohorts of patients following progression on targeted therapy. Here, in a prospective cohort of 42 patients with molecularly defined gastrointestinal cancers and acquired resistance to targeted therapy, direct comparison of postprogression cfDNA versus tumor biopsy revealed that cfDNA more frequently identified clinically relevant resistance alterations and multiple resistance mechanisms, detecting resistance alterations not found in the matched tumor biopsy in 78% of cases. Whole-exome sequencing of serial cfDNA, tumor biopsies and rapid autopsy specimens elucidated substantial geographic and evolutionary differences across lesions. Our data suggest that acquired resistance is frequently characterized by profound tumor heterogeneity, and that the emergence of multiple resistance alterations in an individual patient may represent the ‘rule’ rather than the ‘exception’. These findings have profound therapeutic implications and highlight the potential advantages of cfDNA over tissue biopsy in the setting of acquired resistance.
2019
25
9
1415
1421
http://www.nature.com/nm/index.html
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6741444/
Autopsy; Cell-Free Nucleic Acids; Cohort Studies; DNA, Neoplasm; Drug Resistance, Neoplasm; Female; Gastrointestinal Neoplasms; Genetic Heterogeneity; Humans; Male; Middle Aged; Mutation; Proto-Oncogene Proteins B-raf; Whole Exome Sequencing; Liquid Biopsy
Parikh A.R.; Leshchiner I.; Elagina L.; Goyal L.; Levovitz C.; Siravegna G.; Livitz D.; Rhrissorrakrai K.; Martin E.E.; Van Seventer E.E.; Hanna M.; S...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
s41591-019-0561-9 LvT.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 3.29 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.29 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1728489
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 211
  • Scopus 335
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 313
social impact