Experimental economics uses response times as a tool to evaluate the instinctiveness of choices and behaviours. They have been used to define types of subjects, but never to evaluate the stability of such types. This paper defines stability of types in terms of the variability exhibited by the choices made by an individual in a repeated experiment. The analysis of response times and type stability shows that stability is more instinctive than instability, supporting the idea that types exist and that deviations require cognitive effort.
Some Experimental Evidence on Type Stability and Response Times
Gianna Lotito;Matteo Migheli;Guido Ortona
2019-01-01
Abstract
Experimental economics uses response times as a tool to evaluate the instinctiveness of choices and behaviours. They have been used to define types of subjects, but never to evaluate the stability of such types. This paper defines stability of types in terms of the variability exhibited by the choices made by an individual in a repeated experiment. The analysis of response times and type stability shows that stability is more instinctive than instability, supporting the idea that types exist and that deviations require cognitive effort.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
wp_19_2019.pdf
Accesso aperto
Descrizione: Articolo principale
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
381.24 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
381.24 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.