5-year survival of patients with Unprotected left main (ULM) stenosis according to the choice of revascularization (percutaneous vs. surgical) remains to be defined.

Percutaneous vs. surgical revascularization for patients with unprotected left main stenosis: a meta-analysis of 5 years follow-up RCTs

D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio
First
;
De Filippo, Ovidio;Elia, Edoardo;Doronzo, Mattia Paolo;Omedè, Pierluigi;Salizzoni, Stefano;Conrotto, Federico;Gallone, Guglielmo;Angelini, Filippo;Franchin, Luca;Bruno, Francesco;Boffini, Massimo;Rinaldi, Mauro
Co-last
;
De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria
Co-last
2021-01-01

Abstract

5-year survival of patients with Unprotected left main (ULM) stenosis according to the choice of revascularization (percutaneous vs. surgical) remains to be defined.
2021
7
5
476
485
Coronary artery disease; Unprotected left main (ULM); coronary artery bypass graft (CABG); meta-analysis; percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI)
D'Ascenzo, Fabrizio; De Filippo, Ovidio; Elia, Edoardo; Doronzo, Mattia Paolo; Omedè, Pierluigi; Montefusco, Antonio; Pennone, Mauro; Salizzoni, Stefa...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1739175
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 12
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 18
social impact