This paper makes a reassessment of macroeconomic paradigms in the light of the Pandemic crisis, which has generated a great debate among economists on a number of issues. In particular, it focuses on how the key one of government debt is interpreted by three alternative macroeconomic approaches: namely, standard neoclassical macro, mainstream new Keynesians and economists closer to Keynes. In order to compare such approaches in a simple way, the chapter relies upon the ‘Ulysses’ journey home’ metaphor, which has been used recently to interpret Keynes’s General Theory.
Macroeconomics in the time of the coronavirus pandemic: alternative stances on government debt
Teodoro TOGATI
2020-01-01
Abstract
This paper makes a reassessment of macroeconomic paradigms in the light of the Pandemic crisis, which has generated a great debate among economists on a number of issues. In particular, it focuses on how the key one of government debt is interpreted by three alternative macroeconomic approaches: namely, standard neoclassical macro, mainstream new Keynesians and economists closer to Keynes. In order to compare such approaches in a simple way, the chapter relies upon the ‘Ulysses’ journey home’ metaphor, which has been used recently to interpret Keynes’s General Theory.File in questo prodotto:
File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
MACRO CORONA.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PREPRINT (PRIMA BOZZA)
Dimensione
124.86 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
124.86 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.