OBJECTIVE: To develop a diagnostic model based on plasma-derived extracellular vesicle (EV) subpopulations in Parkinson disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonism (AP), we applied an innovative flow cytometric multiplex bead-based platform. METHODS: Plasma-derived EVs were isolated from PD, matched healthy controls, multiple system atrophy (MSA), and AP with tauopathies (AP-Tau). The expression levels of 37 EV surface markers were measured by flow cytometry and correlated with clinical scales. A diagnostic model based on EV surface markers expression was built via supervised machine learning algorithms and validated in an external cohort. RESULTS: Distinctive pools of EV surface markers related to inflammatory and immune cells stratified patients according to the clinical diagnosis. PD and MSA displayed a greater pool of overexpressed immune markers, suggesting a different immune dysregulation in PD and MSA vs AP-Tau. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of a compound EV marker showed optimal diagnostic performance for PD (area under the curve [AUC] 0.908; sensitivity 96.3%, specificity 78.9%) and MSA (AUC 0.974; sensitivity 100%, specificity 94.7%) and good accuracy for AP-Tau (AUC 0.718; sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 89.5%). A diagnostic model based on EV marker expression correctly classified 88.9% of patients with reliable diagnostic performance after internal and external validations. CONCLUSIONS: Immune profiling of plasmatic EVs represents a crucial step toward the identification of biomarkers of disease for PD and AP.

Immune profiling of plasma-derived extracellular vesicles identifies Parkinson disease

Burrello J.;
2020-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To develop a diagnostic model based on plasma-derived extracellular vesicle (EV) subpopulations in Parkinson disease (PD) and atypical parkinsonism (AP), we applied an innovative flow cytometric multiplex bead-based platform. METHODS: Plasma-derived EVs were isolated from PD, matched healthy controls, multiple system atrophy (MSA), and AP with tauopathies (AP-Tau). The expression levels of 37 EV surface markers were measured by flow cytometry and correlated with clinical scales. A diagnostic model based on EV surface markers expression was built via supervised machine learning algorithms and validated in an external cohort. RESULTS: Distinctive pools of EV surface markers related to inflammatory and immune cells stratified patients according to the clinical diagnosis. PD and MSA displayed a greater pool of overexpressed immune markers, suggesting a different immune dysregulation in PD and MSA vs AP-Tau. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of a compound EV marker showed optimal diagnostic performance for PD (area under the curve [AUC] 0.908; sensitivity 96.3%, specificity 78.9%) and MSA (AUC 0.974; sensitivity 100%, specificity 94.7%) and good accuracy for AP-Tau (AUC 0.718; sensitivity 77.8%, specificity 89.5%). A diagnostic model based on EV marker expression correctly classified 88.9% of patients with reliable diagnostic performance after internal and external validations. CONCLUSIONS: Immune profiling of plasmatic EVs represents a crucial step toward the identification of biomarkers of disease for PD and AP.
2020
7
6 - Article e866
1
16
Vacchi E.; Burrello J.; Di Silvestre D.; Burrello A.; Bolis S.; Mauri P.; Vassalli G.; Cereda C.W.; Farina C.; Barile L.; Kaelin-Lang A.; Melli G....espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2020 - EV & JB - EM-PD - NNINI.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Manoscritto originale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 2.04 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.04 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1764566
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 28
  • Scopus 39
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 36
social impact