In order to investigate whether plant hydraulic conductance (gplant) is reduced under drought conditions via an ABA-related mechanism, a water-stress experiment was carried out using split-rooted grapevines. In addition, inversion of shoot growth orientation was imposed to reduce gplant independently of soil water availability, and thus of the putative ABA root-generated stress message. As expected, water stress imposed on split-roots affected ABA accumulation. ABA drought-stress message negatively affected stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration (E), but modified neither leaf or stem water potentials (Ψleaf and Ψstem, respectively), nor gplant. When gplant was reduced in split-rooted, shoot-inverted (s-r/s-i) grapevines, Ψleaf and Ψstem decreased, without changes in ABA accumulation, gs and E. The ABA drought-stress message did not modify gplant, nor did gplant (impaired by shoot-growth inversion) decrease ABA delivery to the leaves. However, leaf growth was depressed in s-r/s-i grapevines. The fact that no interaction between ABA stress messages (caused by split-root technique) and hydraulic constraints to sap flow (caused by shoot inversion) was necessary to impair leaf growth suggests that the targets of ABA and hydraulic-limitation effects on leaf expansion are not the same.
Whole-plant hydraulic conductance and root-to-shoot flow of abscisic acid are independently affected by water stress in grapevines.
LOVISOLO, Claudio;SCHUBERT, Andrea
2002-01-01
Abstract
In order to investigate whether plant hydraulic conductance (gplant) is reduced under drought conditions via an ABA-related mechanism, a water-stress experiment was carried out using split-rooted grapevines. In addition, inversion of shoot growth orientation was imposed to reduce gplant independently of soil water availability, and thus of the putative ABA root-generated stress message. As expected, water stress imposed on split-roots affected ABA accumulation. ABA drought-stress message negatively affected stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration (E), but modified neither leaf or stem water potentials (Ψleaf and Ψstem, respectively), nor gplant. When gplant was reduced in split-rooted, shoot-inverted (s-r/s-i) grapevines, Ψleaf and Ψstem decreased, without changes in ABA accumulation, gs and E. The ABA drought-stress message did not modify gplant, nor did gplant (impaired by shoot-growth inversion) decrease ABA delivery to the leaves. However, leaf growth was depressed in s-r/s-i grapevines. The fact that no interaction between ABA stress messages (caused by split-root technique) and hydraulic constraints to sap flow (caused by shoot inversion) was necessary to impair leaf growth suggests that the targets of ABA and hydraulic-limitation effects on leaf expansion are not the same.File | Dimensione | Formato | |
---|---|---|---|
FPB2002.pdf
Accesso riservato
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
254.34 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
254.34 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri Richiedi una copia |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.