In order to investigate whether plant hydraulic conductance (gplant) is reduced under drought conditions via an ABA-related mechanism, a water-stress experiment was carried out using split-rooted grapevines. In addition, inversion of shoot growth orientation was imposed to reduce gplant independently of soil water availability, and thus of the putative ABA root-generated stress message. As expected, water stress imposed on split-roots affected ABA accumulation. ABA drought-stress message negatively affected stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration (E), but modified neither leaf or stem water potentials (Ψleaf and Ψstem, respectively), nor gplant. When gplant was reduced in split-rooted, shoot-inverted (s-r/s-i) grapevines, Ψleaf and Ψstem decreased, without changes in ABA accumulation, gs and E. The ABA drought-stress message did not modify gplant, nor did gplant (impaired by shoot-growth inversion) decrease ABA delivery to the leaves. However, leaf growth was depressed in s-r/s-i grapevines. The fact that no interaction between ABA stress messages (caused by split-root technique) and hydraulic constraints to sap flow (caused by shoot inversion) was necessary to impair leaf growth suggests that the targets of ABA and hydraulic-limitation effects on leaf expansion are not the same.

Whole-plant hydraulic conductance and root-to-shoot flow of abscisic acid are independently affected by water stress in grapevines.

LOVISOLO, Claudio;SCHUBERT, Andrea
2002-01-01

Abstract

In order to investigate whether plant hydraulic conductance (gplant) is reduced under drought conditions via an ABA-related mechanism, a water-stress experiment was carried out using split-rooted grapevines. In addition, inversion of shoot growth orientation was imposed to reduce gplant independently of soil water availability, and thus of the putative ABA root-generated stress message. As expected, water stress imposed on split-roots affected ABA accumulation. ABA drought-stress message negatively affected stomatal conductance (gs) and transpiration (E), but modified neither leaf or stem water potentials (Ψleaf and Ψstem, respectively), nor gplant. When gplant was reduced in split-rooted, shoot-inverted (s-r/s-i) grapevines, Ψleaf and Ψstem decreased, without changes in ABA accumulation, gs and E. The ABA drought-stress message did not modify gplant, nor did gplant (impaired by shoot-growth inversion) decrease ABA delivery to the leaves. However, leaf growth was depressed in s-r/s-i grapevines. The fact that no interaction between ABA stress messages (caused by split-root technique) and hydraulic constraints to sap flow (caused by shoot inversion) was necessary to impair leaf growth suggests that the targets of ABA and hydraulic-limitation effects on leaf expansion are not the same.
2002
29 (11)
1349
1356
http://www.publish.csiro.au/index.cfm?paper=FP02079
ABA; abscisic acid; cavitation; embolism; hydraulic conductivity; root-to-shoot signal; split-root; stomatal conductance; Vitis vinifera L.; water stress.
C. LOVISOLO; HARTUNG W; SCHUBERT A
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
FPB2002.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 254.34 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
254.34 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1769
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 129
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 114
social impact