Despite their ecological importance and diversity, spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) are underrepresented in conservation policies in comparison to other groups. We review all extant conservation tools focusing on spiders in Europe, highlighting general patterns, limitations, gaps, and future directions. We assembled a comprehensive online database reporting all available information concerning legal protection and conservation status of 4,154 spider species. Existing international legislation has limited coverage, with only one species listed in the Bern Convention and EU Habitats Directive. At the national and subnational levels, 178 species are formally mentioned in the legislation of 19 European countries. Moreover, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) includes assessments for 301 species worldwide, 167 of these threatened and eight native to Europe. In addition, spiders are mentioned in Regional Red Lists and Red Books in 28 out of 42 European countries considered in this review. Northern and Central European countries have the highest percentage of species assessed at the regional level in Red Lists and Red Books. The Mediterranean basin has the highest spider diversities in Europe but conservation efforts are lacking, both in terms of assessments and national or subnational legislation. Among European species, Dolomedes plantarius, Argyroneta aquatica and Eresus kollari are the most frequently mentioned in European conservation measures, possibly due to their ecological traits and their strict association with declining habitats. Considering the current threats to spiders in Europe, the protection of large areas of suitable habitat should be considered as the most effective approach to spider conservation.

Spider conservation in Europe: a review  

Filippo MILANO
First
;
Marco ISAIA
Last
2021-01-01

Abstract

Despite their ecological importance and diversity, spiders (Arachnida: Araneae) are underrepresented in conservation policies in comparison to other groups. We review all extant conservation tools focusing on spiders in Europe, highlighting general patterns, limitations, gaps, and future directions. We assembled a comprehensive online database reporting all available information concerning legal protection and conservation status of 4,154 spider species. Existing international legislation has limited coverage, with only one species listed in the Bern Convention and EU Habitats Directive. At the national and subnational levels, 178 species are formally mentioned in the legislation of 19 European countries. Moreover, the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) includes assessments for 301 species worldwide, 167 of these threatened and eight native to Europe. In addition, spiders are mentioned in Regional Red Lists and Red Books in 28 out of 42 European countries considered in this review. Northern and Central European countries have the highest percentage of species assessed at the regional level in Red Lists and Red Books. The Mediterranean basin has the highest spider diversities in Europe but conservation efforts are lacking, both in terms of assessments and national or subnational legislation. Among European species, Dolomedes plantarius, Argyroneta aquatica and Eresus kollari are the most frequently mentioned in European conservation measures, possibly due to their ecological traits and their strict association with declining habitats. Considering the current threats to spiders in Europe, the protection of large areas of suitable habitat should be considered as the most effective approach to spider conservation.
2021
256
109020
1
20
https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0006320721000720?via=ihub
IUCN, invertebrate conservation, Araneae, Red List, environmental legislation, threatened species
Filippo MILANO; Theo BLICK; Pedro CARDOSO; Maria CHATZAKI; Caroline Sayuri FUKUSHIMA; Peter GAJDOŠ; Alastair T GIBBONS; Sergio HENRIQUES; Nuria MACÍAS-HERNÁNDEZ; Stefano MAMMOLA; Wolfgang NENTWIG; Myles NOLAN; Julien PÉTILLON; Nina POLCHANINOVA; Milan ŘEZÁČ; Jonas SANDSTRÖM; Helen SMITH; Konrad WIŚNIEWSKI; Marco ISAIA
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Milano_et_al_2021_BIOL_CONS.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: pdf editoriale
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 3.48 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
3.48 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Milano,2021-Spider_conservation_in_Europe_a_review.pdf

Open Access dal 02/04/2022

Descrizione: post print
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 9.5 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
9.5 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1771810
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 25
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 23
social impact