Whereas pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the universally agreed target in catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF, an ideal ablation set in persistent AF remains questioned. Aim of this study is to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing different ablation strategies in persistent AF patients.

Comparative efficacy and safety of different catheter ablation strategies for persistent atrial fibrillation: a network meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

Saglietto, Andrea;Gaita, Fiorenzo;De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria
;
Anselmino, Matteo
Last
2022-01-01

Abstract

Whereas pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is the universally agreed target in catheter ablation of paroxysmal AF, an ideal ablation set in persistent AF remains questioned. Aim of this study is to conduct a network meta-analysis (NMA) of randomized controlled clinical trials (RCTs) comparing different ablation strategies in persistent AF patients.
2022
8
6
619
629
https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjqcco/qcab066
Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Persistent; Strategies
Saglietto, Andrea; Ballatore, Andrea; Gaita, Fiorenzo; Scaglione, Marco; De Ponti, Roberto; De Ferrari, Gaetano Maria; Anselmino, Matteo
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
post print.pdf

Open Access dal 10/10/2022

Descrizione: post print con embargo 12 mesi
Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 1.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.22 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1802252
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 12
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 12
social impact