A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the accuracy of people with schizophrenia in self-reporting their real-life functioning. In a large (n = 618) cohort of stable, community-dwelling schizophrenia patients we sought to: (1) examine the concordance of patients’ reports of their real-life functioning with the reports of their key caregiver; (2) identify which patient characteristics are associated to the differences between patients and informants. Patient-caregiver concordance of the ratings in three Specific Level of Functioning Scale (SLOF) domains (interpersonal relationships, everyday life skills, work skills) was evaluated with matched-pair t tests, the Lin’s concordance correlation, Somers’ D, and Bland–Altman plots with limits of agreement (LOA). Predictors of the patient-caregiver differences in SLOF ratings were assessed with a linear regression with multivariable fractional polynomials. Patients’ self-evaluation of functioning was higher than caregivers’ in all the evaluated domains of the SLOF and 17.6% of the patients exceeded the LOA, thus providing a self-evaluation discordant from their key caregivers. The strongest predictors of patient-caregiver discrepancies were caregivers’ ratings in each SLOF domain. In clinically stable outpatients with a moderate degree of functional impairment, self-evaluation with the SLOF scale can become a useful, informative and reliable clinical tool to design a tailored rehabilitation program.

Accuracy of self-assessment of real-life functioning in schizophrenia

Rocca P.;Brasso C.;Montemagni C.;Bellino S.;Bozzatello P.;Badino C.;Giordano B.;
2021-01-01

Abstract

A consensus has not yet been reached regarding the accuracy of people with schizophrenia in self-reporting their real-life functioning. In a large (n = 618) cohort of stable, community-dwelling schizophrenia patients we sought to: (1) examine the concordance of patients’ reports of their real-life functioning with the reports of their key caregiver; (2) identify which patient characteristics are associated to the differences between patients and informants. Patient-caregiver concordance of the ratings in three Specific Level of Functioning Scale (SLOF) domains (interpersonal relationships, everyday life skills, work skills) was evaluated with matched-pair t tests, the Lin’s concordance correlation, Somers’ D, and Bland–Altman plots with limits of agreement (LOA). Predictors of the patient-caregiver differences in SLOF ratings were assessed with a linear regression with multivariable fractional polynomials. Patients’ self-evaluation of functioning was higher than caregivers’ in all the evaluated domains of the SLOF and 17.6% of the patients exceeded the LOA, thus providing a self-evaluation discordant from their key caregivers. The strongest predictors of patient-caregiver discrepancies were caregivers’ ratings in each SLOF domain. In clinically stable outpatients with a moderate degree of functional impairment, self-evaluation with the SLOF scale can become a useful, informative and reliable clinical tool to design a tailored rehabilitation program.
2021
7
1
1
10
https://www.nature.com/articles/s41537-021-00140-9.pdf
Rocca P.; Brasso C.; Montemagni C.; Bellino S.; Rossi A.; Bertolino A.; Gibertoni D.; Aguglia E.; Amore M.; Andriola I.; Bellomo A.; Bucci P.; Buzzanca A.; Carpiniello B.; Cuomo A.; Dell'Osso L.; Favaro A.; Giordano G.M.; Marchesi C.; Monteleone P.; Oldani L.; Pompili M.; Roncone R.; Rossi R.; Siracusano A.; Vita A.; Zeppegno P.; Galderisi S.; Maj M.; Bozzatello P.; Badino C.; Giordano B.; Di Palo P.; Calia V.; Papalino M.; Barlati S.; Deste G.; Ceraso A.; Pinna F.; Olivieri B.; Manca D.; Piegari G.; Brando F.; Giuliani L.; Aiello C.; Poli L.F.; Concerto C.; Surace T.; Altamura M.; Malerba S.; Padalino F.; Calcagno P.; Murri M.B.; Amerio A.; Pacitti F.; Socci V.; Lucaselli A.; Giusti L.; Salza A.; Ussorio D.; Iasevoli F.; Gramaglia C.; Gambaro E.; Gattoni E.; Tenconi E.; Collantoni E.; Meneguzzo P.; Ossola P.; Tonna M.; Gerra M.L.; Carmassi C.; Carpita B.; Cremone I.M.; Corrivetti G.; Cascino G.; Marciello F.; Brugnoli R.; Comparelli A.; Corigliano V.; Girardi N.; Accinni T.; Carlone L.; Fagiolini A.; Goracci A.; Bolognesi S.; Di Lorenzo G.; Niolu C.; Ribolsi M.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
41537 2021 Article 140.pdf

Accesso aperto

Descrizione: Articolo
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.22 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.22 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1833104
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 17
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact