Objective: To report complications and long-term outcomes after submucosal resections of benign and malignant epithelial rectal masses. Study design: Retrospective multicentric study. Sample population: Medical records of 93 dogs at 7 referral hospitals. Methods: Records were reviewed for surgical time, diagnosis, margins, complications, and recurrences. Survival of dogs was evaluated based on tumor types, categorized as benign, carcinoma in situ, and carcinoma. The Kaplan- Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to determine the association of a range of variables with recurrence and survival time. Results: Duration of follow up was 708 days (range, 25-4383). Twenty-seven dogs (29%) developed complications. Recurrence was identified in 20/93 (21%), with 12/20 recurrent masses treated with repeat submucosal resection. Median survival was not reached in any group. The 1-,2-, 5-year survival rates for carcinomas were 95%, 89%, and 73% respectively. However, overall survival was longer for benign tumors than carcinomas (P = .001). Recurrence was more likely when complications (P = .032) or incomplete margins (P = .023) were present. Recurrence was associated with an increased risk of death (P = .046). Conclusion: Submucosal resection of both benign and malignant rectal masses was associated with a low rate of severe complications and prolonged survival in the 93 dogs described here. Clinical significance: Submucosal resection is a suitable technique for resection of selected rectal masses.

Submucosal resection via a transanal approach for treatment of epithelial rectal tumors – a multicenter study

Emanuela M Morello;
2022-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To report complications and long-term outcomes after submucosal resections of benign and malignant epithelial rectal masses. Study design: Retrospective multicentric study. Sample population: Medical records of 93 dogs at 7 referral hospitals. Methods: Records were reviewed for surgical time, diagnosis, margins, complications, and recurrences. Survival of dogs was evaluated based on tumor types, categorized as benign, carcinoma in situ, and carcinoma. The Kaplan- Meier survival curve and Cox proportional hazards analysis were used to determine the association of a range of variables with recurrence and survival time. Results: Duration of follow up was 708 days (range, 25-4383). Twenty-seven dogs (29%) developed complications. Recurrence was identified in 20/93 (21%), with 12/20 recurrent masses treated with repeat submucosal resection. Median survival was not reached in any group. The 1-,2-, 5-year survival rates for carcinomas were 95%, 89%, and 73% respectively. However, overall survival was longer for benign tumors than carcinomas (P = .001). Recurrence was more likely when complications (P = .032) or incomplete margins (P = .023) were present. Recurrence was associated with an increased risk of death (P = .046). Conclusion: Submucosal resection of both benign and malignant rectal masses was associated with a low rate of severe complications and prolonged survival in the 93 dogs described here. Clinical significance: Submucosal resection is a suitable technique for resection of selected rectal masses.
2022
1
12
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/vsu.13766
rectal tumor, dog
Matteo Cantatore, Juan Carlos Jimeno Sandoval, Smita Das, Alberto Sesana, Tim Charlesworth, Tony Ryan, Emanuela M Morello, Matteo Gobbetti, Filippo Cinti, Matteo Rossanese,
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Post print cantatore.docx

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 59.13 kB
Formato Microsoft Word XML
59.13 kB Microsoft Word XML   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia
Post print cantatore.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 428.37 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
428.37 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1834244
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 2
  • Scopus 3
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 3
social impact