Background: Aim of this study is to evaluate long-term results in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery by either open aortic repair (OAR) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in pa-tients under 70 years of age.Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of patients with age under 70 years old undergoing elective infrarenal AAA surgery between 2010 and 2018 was per-formed. The study population was divided into 2 groups: OAR and EVAR. Primary end points were overall survival and aneurysm-related death, while secondary outcomes were need for reintervention and development of minor and major complications.Results: One hundred ninety-one patients younger than 70 years old treated with elective AAA surgery were enrolled: 157 OAR (98% males, mean age 65 +/- 4 years) and 34 EVAR (94% males, mean age 66 +/- 4 years). Hospital stay, 30-day mortality, and need for reintervention were similar; OAR population presented higher incidence of postoperative major complications (18% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.01) while minor complications were 32% in the OAR versus 21% in the EVAR group (P = 0.08). Median follow-up was 69 months for OAR (interquartile range [IQR] 53 months) vs. 79 months (IQR 51 months) for EVAR (P = 0.9): long-term AAA-related reinterventions were more frequent after EVAR (1.9% OAR vs. 17% EVAR; P = 0.01) while AAA-related long-term mortality was similar in both subgroups (1.3% OAR and 3% EVAR; P = 0.8). At univariate anal-ysis higher risk of reintervention was reported for conical necks in the EVAR group (P = 0.03) and for the concomitant presence of iliac aneurysms in both groups (P = 0.01).Conclusions: According to our data, EVAR in young patients is presenting an excessive rate of reintervention compared to OAR. The presence of conical neck is an independent predictor of EVAR failure and late reintervention, while it does not play a significant role in the OAR group. Open surgery should be considered the first option in younger patients with a long-life expectancy.

Long-Term Outcomes of Open and Endovascular Abdominal Aortic Repair in Younger Patients

Gibello, Lorenzo
First
;
Verzini, Fabio;Spalla, Flavia;Frola, Edoardo;Porro, Luca;Peluttiero, Ilaria;Ripepi, Matteo;Boero, Michele;Varetto, Gianfranco
2022-01-01

Abstract

Background: Aim of this study is to evaluate long-term results in abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) surgery by either open aortic repair (OAR) or endovascular aortic repair (EVAR) in pa-tients under 70 years of age.Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database of patients with age under 70 years old undergoing elective infrarenal AAA surgery between 2010 and 2018 was per-formed. The study population was divided into 2 groups: OAR and EVAR. Primary end points were overall survival and aneurysm-related death, while secondary outcomes were need for reintervention and development of minor and major complications.Results: One hundred ninety-one patients younger than 70 years old treated with elective AAA surgery were enrolled: 157 OAR (98% males, mean age 65 +/- 4 years) and 34 EVAR (94% males, mean age 66 +/- 4 years). Hospital stay, 30-day mortality, and need for reintervention were similar; OAR population presented higher incidence of postoperative major complications (18% vs. 2.9%; P = 0.01) while minor complications were 32% in the OAR versus 21% in the EVAR group (P = 0.08). Median follow-up was 69 months for OAR (interquartile range [IQR] 53 months) vs. 79 months (IQR 51 months) for EVAR (P = 0.9): long-term AAA-related reinterventions were more frequent after EVAR (1.9% OAR vs. 17% EVAR; P = 0.01) while AAA-related long-term mortality was similar in both subgroups (1.3% OAR and 3% EVAR; P = 0.8). At univariate anal-ysis higher risk of reintervention was reported for conical necks in the EVAR group (P = 0.03) and for the concomitant presence of iliac aneurysms in both groups (P = 0.01).Conclusions: According to our data, EVAR in young patients is presenting an excessive rate of reintervention compared to OAR. The presence of conical neck is an independent predictor of EVAR failure and late reintervention, while it does not play a significant role in the OAR group. Open surgery should be considered the first option in younger patients with a long-life expectancy.
2022
85
323
330
Gibello, Lorenzo; Verzini, Fabio; Spalla, Flavia; Frola, Edoardo; Porro, Luca; Peluttiero, Ilaria; Ripepi, Matteo; Boero, Michele; Varetto, Gianfranco
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
AAA Young patients.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 635.98 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
635.98 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1884840
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 1
social impact