Face masks represent an effective COVID-19 mitigation strategy: this study investigated the quality in use of FFP2 mask in a group of 156 frontline HCWs recruited through a snowball procedure in northwest Italy. Participants filled out an online questionnaire (January 2022) on FFP2 sources of discomfort, physical disturbance at different anatomical points, and improvement suggestions. Most of the participants (69%) reported a feeling of protection and safety, but they also reported episodes of dyspnea (70%). The majority of glasses wearers (62%) reported fogging and displacement of their glasses. Humidity and heat were the main discomfort sources (39%), followed by elastic bands (32%). Physical disturbances were frequent and heavier on the ears, nose, and cheekbones. Nursing aides and nurses perceived significantly more discomfort compared to doctors, and nursing aides have the highest physical disturbance. To address these issues, following participants’ suggestions, FFP2 masks should be redesigned to be more adjustable, with different sizes and softer fabrics. The investigation pointed out criticalities in the use of FFP2 masks related to different professional roles within the overall group of HCWs and stressed the need of a FFP2 human-centred design that accounts not only for physical but also for workload and task variability.

Discomfort in Use and Physical Disturbance of FFP2 Masks in a Group of Italian Doctors, Nurses and Nursing Aides during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Micheletti Cremasco M.;Caffaro F.
2023-01-01

Abstract

Face masks represent an effective COVID-19 mitigation strategy: this study investigated the quality in use of FFP2 mask in a group of 156 frontline HCWs recruited through a snowball procedure in northwest Italy. Participants filled out an online questionnaire (January 2022) on FFP2 sources of discomfort, physical disturbance at different anatomical points, and improvement suggestions. Most of the participants (69%) reported a feeling of protection and safety, but they also reported episodes of dyspnea (70%). The majority of glasses wearers (62%) reported fogging and displacement of their glasses. Humidity and heat were the main discomfort sources (39%), followed by elastic bands (32%). Physical disturbances were frequent and heavier on the ears, nose, and cheekbones. Nursing aides and nurses perceived significantly more discomfort compared to doctors, and nursing aides have the highest physical disturbance. To address these issues, following participants’ suggestions, FFP2 masks should be redesigned to be more adjustable, with different sizes and softer fabrics. The investigation pointed out criticalities in the use of FFP2 masks related to different professional roles within the overall group of HCWs and stressed the need of a FFP2 human-centred design that accounts not only for physical but also for workload and task variability.
2023
9
2
1
17
https://www.mdpi.com/2313-576X/9/2/40
COVID-19, face mask, healthcare workers, occupational safety, quality in use
Micheletti Cremasco M., Vigoroso L., Solinas C. , Caffaro F.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2023_Micheletti Cremasco_Disconfort in use_Safety-Q2_09-00040_online.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 390.73 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
390.73 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1907394
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact