A Prediction Interval (PI) is the range of values in which the real target value of a supervised learning task is expected to fall into, and it should combine two contrasting properties: to be as narrow as possible, and to include as many data observations as possible. This article presents an study on modelling Prediction Intervals (PI) with two Genetic Programming (GP) methods. The first proposed GP method is called CWC-GP, and it evolves simultaneously the lower and upper boundaries of the PI using a single fitness measure. This measure is the Coverage Width-based Cri- terion (CWC), which combines the width and the probability coverage of the PI. The second proposed GP method is called LUBE-GP, and it evolves independently the lower and upper boundaries of the PI. This method applies a multi-objective approach, in which one fitness aims to minimise the width and the other aims to maximise the probability coverage of the PI. Both methods were applied with the Direct and the Sequential approaches. In the former, the PI is assessed without the crisp prediction of the model. In the latter, the method makes use of the crisp prediction to find the PI boundaries. The proposed methods showed to have good potential on assessing PIs and the results pave the way to further investigations.

Single and Multi-objective Genetic Programming Methods for Prediction Intervals

Karina Brotto Rebuli
;
Mario Giacobini;Niccolo Tallone;
2023-01-01

Abstract

A Prediction Interval (PI) is the range of values in which the real target value of a supervised learning task is expected to fall into, and it should combine two contrasting properties: to be as narrow as possible, and to include as many data observations as possible. This article presents an study on modelling Prediction Intervals (PI) with two Genetic Programming (GP) methods. The first proposed GP method is called CWC-GP, and it evolves simultaneously the lower and upper boundaries of the PI using a single fitness measure. This measure is the Coverage Width-based Cri- terion (CWC), which combines the width and the probability coverage of the PI. The second proposed GP method is called LUBE-GP, and it evolves independently the lower and upper boundaries of the PI. This method applies a multi-objective approach, in which one fitness aims to minimise the width and the other aims to maximise the probability coverage of the PI. Both methods were applied with the Direct and the Sequential approaches. In the former, the PI is assessed without the crisp prediction of the model. In the latter, the method makes use of the crisp prediction to find the PI boundaries. The proposed methods showed to have good potential on assessing PIs and the results pave the way to further investigations.
2023
XVI International Workshop on Artificial Life and Evolutionary Computation (WIVACE 2022)
Gaeta, Italy
14 to 16 of September 2022
Artificial Life and Evolutionary Computation
De Stefano, C., Fontanella, F., Vanneschi, L.
205
218
Prediction Interval, Crisp prediction, Modelling uncertainty, Machine Learning
Karina Brotto Rebuli, Mario Giacobini, Niccolo Tallone, Leonardo Vanneschi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
rebuli_et_al_2023.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 764.77 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
764.77 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1938232
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact