Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a neuromuscular condition characterized by muscle weakness. The Performance of upper limb (PUL) test is designed to evaluate upper limb function in DMD patients across three domains. The aim of this study is to identify frequently lost or gained PUL 2.0 abilities at distinct functional stages in DMD patients. This retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data on 24-month PUL 2.0 changes related to ambulatory function. Ambulant patients were categorized based on initial 6MWT distance, non-ambulant patients by time since ambulation loss. Each PUL 2.0 item was classified as shift up, no change, or shift down. The study's cohort incuded 274 patients, with 626 paired evaluations at the 24-month mark. Among these, 55.1 % had activity loss, while 29.1 % had gains. Ambulant patients showed the lowest loss rates, mainly in the shoulder domain. The highest loss rate was in the shoulder domain in the transitioning subgroup and in elbow and distal domains in the non-ambulant patients. Younger ambulant patients demonstrated multiple gains, whereas in the other functional subgroups there were fewer gains, mostly tied to singular activities. Our findings highlight divergent upper limb domain progression, partly linked to functional status and baseline function.

Gain and loss of upper limb abilities in Duchenne muscular dystrophy patients: A 24-month study

Rolle, Enrica
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Mongini, Tiziana
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
Ricci, Federica
Membro del Collaboration Group
;
2024-01-01

Abstract

Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) is a neuromuscular condition characterized by muscle weakness. The Performance of upper limb (PUL) test is designed to evaluate upper limb function in DMD patients across three domains. The aim of this study is to identify frequently lost or gained PUL 2.0 abilities at distinct functional stages in DMD patients. This retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data on 24-month PUL 2.0 changes related to ambulatory function. Ambulant patients were categorized based on initial 6MWT distance, non-ambulant patients by time since ambulation loss. Each PUL 2.0 item was classified as shift up, no change, or shift down. The study's cohort incuded 274 patients, with 626 paired evaluations at the 24-month mark. Among these, 55.1 % had activity loss, while 29.1 % had gains. Ambulant patients showed the lowest loss rates, mainly in the shoulder domain. The highest loss rate was in the shoulder domain in the transitioning subgroup and in elbow and distal domains in the non-ambulant patients. Younger ambulant patients demonstrated multiple gains, whereas in the other functional subgroups there were fewer gains, mostly tied to singular activities. Our findings highlight divergent upper limb domain progression, partly linked to functional status and baseline function.
2024
34
75
82
Duchenne muscular dystrophy; Performance of upper limb; Shift analysis; Upper limb disease progression; Upper limb function
Coratti, Giorgia; Pane, Marika; Brogna, Claudia; D'Amico, Adele; Pegoraro, Elena; Bello, Luca; Sansone, Valeria A; Albamonte, Emilio; Ferraroli, Elisabetta; Mazzone, Elena Stacy; Fanelli, Lavinia; Messina, Sonia; Sframeli, Maria; Catteruccia, Michela; Cicala, Gianpaolo; Capasso, Anna; Ricci, Martina; Frosini, Silvia; De Luca, Giacomo; Rolle, Enrica; De Sanctis, Roberto; Forcina, Nicola; Norcia, Giulia; Passamano, Luigia; Scutifero, Marianna; Gardani, Alice; Pini, Antonella; Monaco, Giulia; D'Angelo, Maria Grazia; Leone, Daniela; Zanin, Riccardo; Vita, Gian Luca; Panicucci, Chiara; Bruno, Claudio; Mongini, Tiziana; Ricci, Federica; Berardinelli, Angela; Battini, Roberta; Masson, Riccardo; Baranello, Giovanni; Dosi, Claudia; Bertini, Enrico; Nigro, Vincenzo; Politano, Luisa; Mercuri, Eugenio
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1965273
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact