I respond to Karin de Boer, Thomas Land, and Claudio La Rocca's comments on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and the Method of Metaphysics (CUP 2023). I first provide a quick outline of some of the main claims I make in the book. I then directly address their criticisms, which I group into three categories. The first group of comments raises doubts concerning my characterization of the central tasks of the critique of pure reason. The second targets the fact that I downplay faculty analysis as an essential characteristic of the critique. The third has to do with my claim that the Critique of Pure Reason aims to show that metaphysics is capable of architectonic unity, where this unity is only achievable when we construe metaphysics according to the worldly concept of philosophy.

The Nature of the Critique of Pure Reason and the Architectonic Unity of Metaphysics: A Response to my Critics

Gava, Gabriele
2024-01-01

Abstract

I respond to Karin de Boer, Thomas Land, and Claudio La Rocca's comments on Kant's Critique of Pure Reason and the Method of Metaphysics (CUP 2023). I first provide a quick outline of some of the main claims I make in the book. I then directly address their criticisms, which I group into three categories. The first group of comments raises doubts concerning my characterization of the central tasks of the critique of pure reason. The second targets the fact that I downplay faculty analysis as an essential characteristic of the critique. The third has to do with my claim that the Critique of Pure Reason aims to show that metaphysics is capable of architectonic unity, where this unity is only achievable when we construe metaphysics according to the worldly concept of philosophy.
2024
29
1
135
151
https://doi.org/10.1017/S1369415423000493
transcendental philosophy; critique of pure reason; architectonic unity; method; worldly concept of philosophy; school concept of philosophy
Gava, Gabriele
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2024_GAVA_Kantian Review.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 231.71 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
231.71 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1975430
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact