Aim: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of flapless procedure alone or in combination with enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) in the treatment of deep intrabony defects. Materials and methods: Forty-six patients re-evaluated after non-surgical therapy were randomly assigned to the test (flapless with EMD) or control group (flapless alone). Clinical measurements were recorded pre-surgery and at 6 and 12 months after surgery, and radiographic measurements were taken pre-surgery and after 12 months. Results: Forty-six patients completed the study. Improvements were observed in both groups at 12 months for mean clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, with significant differences between test (3.9 ± 1.1 mm) and control groups (3.0 ± 1.2) (p = .017). Probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction (4.0 ± 0.7 vs. 3.3 ± 1.4 mm) was also near to statistical significance (p = .051). Also, more sites achieved successful composite outcome measure (final PPD ≤ 4 mm and CAL gain ≥3 mm) for the regenerative treatment in the flapless + EMD group (82.6% vs. 52.2%; p = .028). In terms of radiographic outcomes, EMD yielded a greater defect bone fill than flapless treatment alone (3.0 ± 1.0 mm vs. 1.8 ± 1.5 mm; p < .001). Conclusions: The additional application of EMD during the flapless procedure for intrabony defects slightly improved clinical and radiographic outcomes. Clinicaltrials: gov identification number: NCT05456555.

The flapless approach with and without enamel matrix derivatives for the treatment of intrabony defects: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Aimetti, Mario
First
;
Baima, Giacomo
;
Romano, Federica
Last
2024-01-01

Abstract

Aim: To compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of flapless procedure alone or in combination with enamel matrix derivatives (EMD) in the treatment of deep intrabony defects. Materials and methods: Forty-six patients re-evaluated after non-surgical therapy were randomly assigned to the test (flapless with EMD) or control group (flapless alone). Clinical measurements were recorded pre-surgery and at 6 and 12 months after surgery, and radiographic measurements were taken pre-surgery and after 12 months. Results: Forty-six patients completed the study. Improvements were observed in both groups at 12 months for mean clinical attachment level (CAL) gain, with significant differences between test (3.9 ± 1.1 mm) and control groups (3.0 ± 1.2) (p = .017). Probing pocket depth (PPD) reduction (4.0 ± 0.7 vs. 3.3 ± 1.4 mm) was also near to statistical significance (p = .051). Also, more sites achieved successful composite outcome measure (final PPD ≤ 4 mm and CAL gain ≥3 mm) for the regenerative treatment in the flapless + EMD group (82.6% vs. 52.2%; p = .028). In terms of radiographic outcomes, EMD yielded a greater defect bone fill than flapless treatment alone (3.0 ± 1.0 mm vs. 1.8 ± 1.5 mm; p < .001). Conclusions: The additional application of EMD during the flapless procedure for intrabony defects slightly improved clinical and radiographic outcomes. Clinicaltrials: gov identification number: NCT05456555.
2024
1
10
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jcpe.14028
enamel matrix derivatives; intrabony defects; minimally invasive non‐surgical procedures; periodontal diseases; periodontal regeneration
Aimetti, Mario; Stasikelyte, Morta; Mariani, Giulia Maria; Cricenti, Luca; Baima, Giacomo; Romano, Federica
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
The flapless approach with and without enamel matrix derivatives.pdf

Accesso riservato

Descrizione: The flapless approach with and without enamel matrix derivatives for the treatment of intrabony defects: A randomized controlled clinical trial
Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.72 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.72 MB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/1985190
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 1
  • Scopus 2
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 2
social impact