Digital gait monitoring is increasingly used to assess locomotion and fall risk. The aim of this work is to analyze the changes in the foot–floor contact sequences of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) patients in the year following the implantation of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). During their best-ON condition, 30 PD patients underwent gait analysis at baseline (T0), at 3 months after subthalamic nucleus DBS neurosurgery (T1), and at 12 months (T2) after subthalamic nucleus DBS neurosurgery. Thirty age-matched controls underwent gait analysis once. Each subject was equipped with bilateral foot-switches and a 5 min walk was recorded, including both straight-line and turnings. The walking speed, turning time, stride time variability, percentage of atypical gait cycles, stance, swing, and double support duration were estimated. Overall, the gait performance of PD patients improved after DBS, as also confirmed by the decrease in their UPDRS-III scores from 19.4 ± 1.8 to 10.2 ± 1.0 (T0 vs. T2) (p < 0.001). In straight-line walking, the percentages of atypical cycles of PD on the more affected side were 11.1 ± 1.5% (at T0), 3.1 ± 1.5% (at T1), and 5.1 ± 2.4% (at T2), while in controls it was 3.1 ± 1.3% (p < 0.0005). In turnings, this percentage was 13.7 ± 1.1% (at T0), 7.8 ± 1.1% (at T1), and 10.9 ± 1.8% (at T2), while in controls it was 8.1 ± 1.0% (p < 0.001). Therefore, in straight-line walking, the atypical cycles decreased by 72% at T1, and by 54% at T2 (with respect to baseline), while, in turnings, atypical cycles decreased by 43% at T1, and by 20% at T2. The percentage of atypical gait cycles proved an informative digital biomarker for quantifying PD gait changes after DBS, both in straight-line paths and turnings.

Foot–Floor Contact Sequences: A Metric for Gait Assessment in Parkinson’s Disease after Deep Brain Stimulation

Rizzi, Laura;Fronda, Chiara;Lanotte, Michele
2024-01-01

Abstract

Digital gait monitoring is increasingly used to assess locomotion and fall risk. The aim of this work is to analyze the changes in the foot–floor contact sequences of Parkinson’s Disease (PD) patients in the year following the implantation of Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS). During their best-ON condition, 30 PD patients underwent gait analysis at baseline (T0), at 3 months after subthalamic nucleus DBS neurosurgery (T1), and at 12 months (T2) after subthalamic nucleus DBS neurosurgery. Thirty age-matched controls underwent gait analysis once. Each subject was equipped with bilateral foot-switches and a 5 min walk was recorded, including both straight-line and turnings. The walking speed, turning time, stride time variability, percentage of atypical gait cycles, stance, swing, and double support duration were estimated. Overall, the gait performance of PD patients improved after DBS, as also confirmed by the decrease in their UPDRS-III scores from 19.4 ± 1.8 to 10.2 ± 1.0 (T0 vs. T2) (p < 0.001). In straight-line walking, the percentages of atypical cycles of PD on the more affected side were 11.1 ± 1.5% (at T0), 3.1 ± 1.5% (at T1), and 5.1 ± 2.4% (at T2), while in controls it was 3.1 ± 1.3% (p < 0.0005). In turnings, this percentage was 13.7 ± 1.1% (at T0), 7.8 ± 1.1% (at T1), and 10.9 ± 1.8% (at T2), while in controls it was 8.1 ± 1.0% (p < 0.001). Therefore, in straight-line walking, the atypical cycles decreased by 72% at T1, and by 54% at T2 (with respect to baseline), while, in turnings, atypical cycles decreased by 43% at T1, and by 20% at T2. The percentage of atypical gait cycles proved an informative digital biomarker for quantifying PD gait changes after DBS, both in straight-line paths and turnings.
2024
24
6593
1
11
DBS gait analysis locomotion
Ghislieri, Marco; Agostini, Valentina; Rizzi, Laura; Fronda, Chiara; Knaflitz, Marco; Lanotte, Michele
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Sensors 2024.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.16 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.16 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2026530
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 0
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 4
social impact