Background: This study evaluates implant-borne prosthetic rehabilitation of 10 totally edentulous atrophic maxillae after bone reconstruction with a titanium-mesh technique and particulate bone graft. Methods: Ten atrophic maxillae were reconstructed with 19 titanium meshes and particulate autologous-heterologous bone. Maxillae were rehabilitated at least 5 months, with placement of 67 implants connected to the prostheses after an additional 4 months of rehabilitation. Cases were evaluated retrospectively in terms of complication rates, particularly on the amount of mesh exposure, implant survival, and success rates at the end of follow-up. Results: In seven cases, two meshes were prematurely exposed (within 4 to 6 weeks), and five were exposed later (after 4 to 6 weeks). Only two of the later exposures extended >1 cm2. Nevertheless, reconstructions allowed implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation in all cases. Two implants were lost before loading. After mean follow-up at 39.3 (20 to 56) months since prosthetic loading, all 65 implants were functional (100% implant survival), but 15 implants demonstrated a peri-implant mean bone resorption of 2.96 mm increased bone loss, yielding a cumulative implant success rate of 76.9%. No prosthetic problem was observed. Conclusions: Use of titanium mesh with particulate bone can be considered a valid option in reconstructing atrophic maxillae to allow for implant-borne prosthetic rehabilitation. A high level of dehiscence did not compromise final outcome.

Titanium mesh technique in rehabilitation of totally edentulous atrophic maxillae: A retrospective case series

LIZIO, GIUSEPPE;
2016-01-01

Abstract

Background: This study evaluates implant-borne prosthetic rehabilitation of 10 totally edentulous atrophic maxillae after bone reconstruction with a titanium-mesh technique and particulate bone graft. Methods: Ten atrophic maxillae were reconstructed with 19 titanium meshes and particulate autologous-heterologous bone. Maxillae were rehabilitated at least 5 months, with placement of 67 implants connected to the prostheses after an additional 4 months of rehabilitation. Cases were evaluated retrospectively in terms of complication rates, particularly on the amount of mesh exposure, implant survival, and success rates at the end of follow-up. Results: In seven cases, two meshes were prematurely exposed (within 4 to 6 weeks), and five were exposed later (after 4 to 6 weeks). Only two of the later exposures extended >1 cm2. Nevertheless, reconstructions allowed implant placement and prosthetic rehabilitation in all cases. Two implants were lost before loading. After mean follow-up at 39.3 (20 to 56) months since prosthetic loading, all 65 implants were functional (100% implant survival), but 15 implants demonstrated a peri-implant mean bone resorption of 2.96 mm increased bone loss, yielding a cumulative implant success rate of 76.9%. No prosthetic problem was observed. Conclusions: Use of titanium mesh with particulate bone can be considered a valid option in reconstructing atrophic maxillae to allow for implant-borne prosthetic rehabilitation. A high level of dehiscence did not compromise final outcome.
2016
87
5
519
528
http://www.joponline.org/doi/pdf/10.1902/jop.2016.150432
Atrophy; Dental implants; Edentulous; jaw; Surgical mesh; Periodontics
PELLEGRINO, GERARDO; LIZIO, GIUSEPPE; CORINALDESI, GIUSEPPE; MARCHETTI, CLAUDIO
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
pellegrino2016.pdf

Accesso riservato

Dimensione 678.08 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
678.08 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2029326
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 7
  • Scopus 18
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 17
social impact