Aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the application of a modified version of the AWIN welfare assessment protocol for goats in alpine farming systems during summer grazing, focusing on inter-observer reliability (IOR) of the indicators and feasibility of the protocol. Three assessors applied the protocol in nine farms exploiting six alpine pastures (APs) in NW Italy. IOR of individual-level indicators was excellent or good, but unacceptable for hair coat condition, probably due to insufficient light conditions that sometimes the assessors faced inside the milking pens. IOR of group-level indicators was unacceptable in most cases. These indicators were collected from a distance, and with limited visibility due to adverse weather conditions, thick vegetation cover or rocky areas, thus explaining the unacceptable reliability. On average, 4 h were needed for the protocol application in each AP. The level of welfare was good. Exceptions regarded the hair coat condition, possibly due to external parasitism, the use of shelter while resting and the level of synchronisation during resting. For the latter, we hypothesise that the time selected for data collection was not ideal, but further studies are required to confirm such hypothesis. The application of the protocol provided useful information about goat welfare in alpine summer ranges but posed issues in terms of feasibility and reliability, especially when considering group-level indicators. Future studies are required to set up a more feasible and reliable protocol for these farming systems, possibly with the aid of Precision Livestock Farming techniques.

The assessment of dairy goats’ welfare in alpine summer ranges

Manuela Renna;Benedetta Torsiello;Luca Battaglini;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Aim of this study was to evaluate the results of the application of a modified version of the AWIN welfare assessment protocol for goats in alpine farming systems during summer grazing, focusing on inter-observer reliability (IOR) of the indicators and feasibility of the protocol. Three assessors applied the protocol in nine farms exploiting six alpine pastures (APs) in NW Italy. IOR of individual-level indicators was excellent or good, but unacceptable for hair coat condition, probably due to insufficient light conditions that sometimes the assessors faced inside the milking pens. IOR of group-level indicators was unacceptable in most cases. These indicators were collected from a distance, and with limited visibility due to adverse weather conditions, thick vegetation cover or rocky areas, thus explaining the unacceptable reliability. On average, 4 h were needed for the protocol application in each AP. The level of welfare was good. Exceptions regarded the hair coat condition, possibly due to external parasitism, the use of shelter while resting and the level of synchronisation during resting. For the latter, we hypothesise that the time selected for data collection was not ideal, but further studies are required to confirm such hypothesis. The application of the protocol provided useful information about goat welfare in alpine summer ranges but posed issues in terms of feasibility and reliability, especially when considering group-level indicators. Future studies are required to set up a more feasible and reliable protocol for these farming systems, possibly with the aid of Precision Livestock Farming techniques.
2025
292
308
Alpine pasture; animal welfare; dairy goats; reliability; animal-based welfare indicators
Manuela Renna; Benedetta Torsiello; Silvana Mattiello; Luca Battaglini; Monica Battini
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
The assessment of dairy goats welfare in alpine summer ranges.pdf

Accesso aperto

Tipo di file: PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione 1.57 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.57 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2064693
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact