Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is a highly toxic and carcinogenic compound produced by certain fungi (e.g., Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus). Rapid and ultra-sensitive detection methods for AFB1 in various commodities are in high demand. This study aimed to enhance the sensitivity of a competitive lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for AFB1 detection by leveraging a previously developed experimental design strategy, named 4S. This approach comprises four phases—START, SHIFT, SHARPEN, and STOP—and involves the analysis of two reference conditions: NEG (0 ng/mL AFB1) and POS (1 ng/mL AFB1). By generating and overlaying response surfaces, regions of optimal NEG signal and POS/NEG signal ratio (IC%) were identified. Four variables were optimized: two related to the labeled antibody (its concentration and antibody-to-label ratio) and two to the competitor antigen (its concentration and hapten-to-protein ratio). An initial design defined the parameter space, while three subsequent designs did not yield further improvements in sensitivity. A strong anti-correlation was observed between the IC% and competitor parameters. The optimized LFIA-1 exhibited enhanced sensitivity, achieving a limit of detection of 0.027 ng/mL compared to 0.1 ng/mL for the original device. Additionally, the amount of expensive antibody required for device fabrication was reduced by around a factor of four
Optimization by 4S sequential experimental design process of a competitive lateral flow immunoassay device for the detection of aflatoxin B1
Simone CavaleraFirst
;Sofia Stanzani;Thea Serra;Valentina Testa;Fabio Di Nardo;Claudio Baggiani;Laura Anfossi
Last
2025-01-01
Abstract
Aflatoxin B1 (AFB1) is a highly toxic and carcinogenic compound produced by certain fungi (e.g., Aspergillus flavus and Aspergillus parasiticus). Rapid and ultra-sensitive detection methods for AFB1 in various commodities are in high demand. This study aimed to enhance the sensitivity of a competitive lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) for AFB1 detection by leveraging a previously developed experimental design strategy, named 4S. This approach comprises four phases—START, SHIFT, SHARPEN, and STOP—and involves the analysis of two reference conditions: NEG (0 ng/mL AFB1) and POS (1 ng/mL AFB1). By generating and overlaying response surfaces, regions of optimal NEG signal and POS/NEG signal ratio (IC%) were identified. Four variables were optimized: two related to the labeled antibody (its concentration and antibody-to-label ratio) and two to the competitor antigen (its concentration and hapten-to-protein ratio). An initial design defined the parameter space, while three subsequent designs did not yield further improvements in sensitivity. A strong anti-correlation was observed between the IC% and competitor parameters. The optimized LFIA-1 exhibited enhanced sensitivity, achieving a limit of detection of 0.027 ng/mL compared to 0.1 ng/mL for the original device. Additionally, the amount of expensive antibody required for device fabrication was reduced by around a factor of four| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
tox25_17_557.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
PDF EDITORIALE
Dimensione
2.16 MB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
2.16 MB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



