We focus on the fragment TFA of λ-calculus. It contains terms which normalize in polynomial time only. Inside TFA we translated BEA, a well known, imperative and fast algorithm which calculates the multiplicative inverse of binary finite fields. The translation suggests how to categorize the operations of BEA in sets which drive the design of a variant that we called DCEA. On several common architectures we show that these two algorithms have comparable performances, while on UltraSPARC and ARM architectures the variant we synthesized from a purely functional source can go considerably faster than BEA.
Can a light typing discipline be compatible with an efficient implementation of finite fields inversion?
Roversi L.
Co-first
Membro del Collaboration Group
2014-01-01
Abstract
We focus on the fragment TFA of λ-calculus. It contains terms which normalize in polynomial time only. Inside TFA we translated BEA, a well known, imperative and fast algorithm which calculates the multiplicative inverse of binary finite fields. The translation suggests how to categorize the operations of BEA in sets which drive the design of a variant that we called DCEA. On several common architectures we show that these two algorithms have comparable performances, while on UltraSPARC and ARM architectures the variant we synthesized from a purely functional source can go considerably faster than BEA.File in questo prodotto:
| File | Dimensione | Formato | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Can_a_Light_Typing_Discipline_Be_Compatible_with_a.pdf
Accesso aperto
Tipo di file:
POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione
813.74 kB
Formato
Adobe PDF
|
813.74 kB | Adobe PDF | Visualizza/Apri |
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.



