Decentralised energy ecosystems suffer from data-governance, scalability and adoption barriers. Although blockchain-based marketplaces can offer transparency and security in Local Energy Communities (LECs), most existing solutions struggle with rigid token models, limited performance, and steep usability barriers. Building on a previous framework, this study presents an enhanced marketplace that integrates a modular blockchain layer, custodial identity management, and a dual-token model for flexible licensing and pricing. Testing on a per-missioned Quorum network with asynchronous queueing demonstrated notable improvements in transaction throughput and user responsiveness under load, while the custodial onboarding flow simplified access for non-technical participants. A refined policy enforcement mechanism further aligns the system with emerging federation standards, mitigating earlier shortcomings related to performance, data sovereignty, and scalability. Benchmarking on a five-node Quorum Proof of Authority (PoA) deployment (one RPC node and four validator nodes) showed that all key operations, including license issuance and asset usage, consistently completed in under 8 seconds, confirming the system's suitability for possible energy data applications. Planned extensions include cross-domain interoperability, self-service governance tools, and zero-knowledge proofs, underscoring this architecture's potential as a robust, future-ready platform for federated energy data ecosystems.

Design and Evaluation of a Sub-8 Second Decentralised Marketplace for Energy Data

Meneguzzo, Silvio;Schifanella, Claudio;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Decentralised energy ecosystems suffer from data-governance, scalability and adoption barriers. Although blockchain-based marketplaces can offer transparency and security in Local Energy Communities (LECs), most existing solutions struggle with rigid token models, limited performance, and steep usability barriers. Building on a previous framework, this study presents an enhanced marketplace that integrates a modular blockchain layer, custodial identity management, and a dual-token model for flexible licensing and pricing. Testing on a per-missioned Quorum network with asynchronous queueing demonstrated notable improvements in transaction throughput and user responsiveness under load, while the custodial onboarding flow simplified access for non-technical participants. A refined policy enforcement mechanism further aligns the system with emerging federation standards, mitigating earlier shortcomings related to performance, data sovereignty, and scalability. Benchmarking on a five-node Quorum Proof of Authority (PoA) deployment (one RPC node and four validator nodes) showed that all key operations, including license issuance and asset usage, consistently completed in under 8 seconds, confirming the system's suitability for possible energy data applications. Planned extensions include cross-domain interoperability, self-service governance tools, and zero-knowledge proofs, underscoring this architecture's potential as a robust, future-ready platform for federated energy data ecosystems.
2025
49th IEEE Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference, COMPSAC 2025
Toronto, Canada
2025
Proceedings - 2025 IEEE 49th Annual Computers, Software, and Applications Conference, COMPSAC 2025
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers Inc.
1722
1727
https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11126861
AI Services; Blockchain; Decentralised Data Marketplace; DLT; Energy Dataspaces; GAIA-X; GDPR; IDS
Meneguzzo, Silvio; Favenza, Alfredo; Schifanella, Claudio; Mozzato, Alessandro; Leto, Stefano
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Design_and_Evaluation_of_a_Sub-8_Second_Decentralised_Marketplace_for_Energy_Data.pdf

Accesso aperto

Dimensione 764.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
764.26 kB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2125910
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 0
social impact