This paper explores conflict resolution in decentralized e-health prescription creation workflows, necessary for secure and efficient multi-stakeholder data sharing. Consensus mechanisms ensure consistency and enable trust across distributed systems. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are adopted for decentralized decision-making in several domains but remain unexplored in e-healthcare. Current consensus mechanisms lack integration with governance models, limiting their adaptability to domain-specific requirements. Moreover, there is no existing consensus algorithm adapted for e-health, resulting in the lack of privacy, interoperability, and patient-centered data ownership. As a result, automatic conflict resolution in interorganizational e-health processes is complicated or almost impossible. To address this gap, we propose a domain-specific consensus algorithm adapted to the requirements of the e-health domain. The algorithm is embedded within a DAO-based governance framework, enabling transparency in decision-making among e-health stakeholders. Such integration enables automated, privacy-preserving conflict resolution in interorganizational e-health workflows. Following the Design Science methodology, the consensus algorithm for e-health DAO is based on stakeholder-driven requirements and evaluated using Colored Petri Nets (CPN). The evaluation shows the solution improves conflict resolution enabling fair, efficient, and privacy-aware collaboration in decentralized e-health.

Requirements for Decentralized Consensus in E-Health Workflows: Towards Trustworthy Interorganizational Coordination

Avanzo S.;Norta A.;Schifanella C.
2025-01-01

Abstract

This paper explores conflict resolution in decentralized e-health prescription creation workflows, necessary for secure and efficient multi-stakeholder data sharing. Consensus mechanisms ensure consistency and enable trust across distributed systems. Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) are adopted for decentralized decision-making in several domains but remain unexplored in e-healthcare. Current consensus mechanisms lack integration with governance models, limiting their adaptability to domain-specific requirements. Moreover, there is no existing consensus algorithm adapted for e-health, resulting in the lack of privacy, interoperability, and patient-centered data ownership. As a result, automatic conflict resolution in interorganizational e-health processes is complicated or almost impossible. To address this gap, we propose a domain-specific consensus algorithm adapted to the requirements of the e-health domain. The algorithm is embedded within a DAO-based governance framework, enabling transparency in decision-making among e-health stakeholders. Such integration enables automated, privacy-preserving conflict resolution in interorganizational e-health workflows. Following the Design Science methodology, the consensus algorithm for e-health DAO is based on stakeholder-driven requirements and evaluated using Colored Petri Nets (CPN). The evaluation shows the solution improves conflict resolution enabling fair, efficient, and privacy-aware collaboration in decentralized e-health.
2025
5th International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good, GoodIT 2025
Antwep, Belgium
2025
GoodIT 2025 - Proceedings of the 2025 International Conference on Information Technology for Social Good
Association for Computing Machinery, Inc
204
212
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3748699.3749793
blockchain; conflict management; decentralized autonomous organization; preventive healthcare; privacy; smart contracts
Kormiltsyn A.; Avanzo S.; Dwivedi V.; Norta A.; Schifanella C.
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
3748699.3749793.pdf

Accesso aperto

Dimensione 1.62 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
1.62 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2125911
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 0
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact