Objective: To characterize the natural history of the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) over a 24-month period following initial assessment, and to assess its associations with survival. Methods: Longitudinal ALSFRS-R measurements and survival data were obtained from seven population-based, European cohorts. Different models for the ALSFRS-R trajectory were evaluated, including tests for linearity and between-cohort differences. We employed a joint modeling framework to factor in mortality, thereby aiming to derive a more precise estimate of the population’s rate of decline, while simultaneously delineating its relationship with survival. Results: In total, 7,030 patients were included who produced 31,746 ALSFRS-R measurements during a follow-up period of 10,285 person-years. There was substantial evidence for a non-linear time trend within all cohorts (all p < 0.001), with faster progression rates at the beginning of follow-up. The average rate over 24 months was 0.89 points per month; 95% of the patients had a rate between 0.04 and 1.96. Overall, two components of the ALSFRS-R trajectory were found to be associated with survival: (1) the actual value of the ALSFRS-R total score and (2) the rate of change at any given time (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Functional loss in ALS follows a decelerating trajectory, where the current functional status and the rate of change have a direct impact on the patient’ s probability of survival. Given the pivotal role of the ALSFRS-R in drug development, these results help to separate treatment benefit from the disease’s natural trajectory and to estimate the impact on survival.

Natural history of the revised ALS functional rating scale and its association with survival: the PRECISION-ALS Extant Study

Chiò, Adriano;Manera, Umberto;Vasta, Rosario;
2025-01-01

Abstract

Objective: To characterize the natural history of the revised ALS functional rating scale (ALSFRS-R) over a 24-month period following initial assessment, and to assess its associations with survival. Methods: Longitudinal ALSFRS-R measurements and survival data were obtained from seven population-based, European cohorts. Different models for the ALSFRS-R trajectory were evaluated, including tests for linearity and between-cohort differences. We employed a joint modeling framework to factor in mortality, thereby aiming to derive a more precise estimate of the population’s rate of decline, while simultaneously delineating its relationship with survival. Results: In total, 7,030 patients were included who produced 31,746 ALSFRS-R measurements during a follow-up period of 10,285 person-years. There was substantial evidence for a non-linear time trend within all cohorts (all p < 0.001), with faster progression rates at the beginning of follow-up. The average rate over 24 months was 0.89 points per month; 95% of the patients had a rate between 0.04 and 1.96. Overall, two components of the ALSFRS-R trajectory were found to be associated with survival: (1) the actual value of the ALSFRS-R total score and (2) the rate of change at any given time (both p < 0.001). Conclusions: Functional loss in ALS follows a decelerating trajectory, where the current functional status and the rate of change have a direct impact on the patient’ s probability of survival. Given the pivotal role of the ALSFRS-R in drug development, these results help to separate treatment benefit from the disease’s natural trajectory and to estimate the impact on survival.
2025
26
sup1
30
40
ALS; ALSFRS-R; joint model; survival
van Eijk, Ruben P A; Weemering, Daphne N; Opie-Martin, Sarah; van Unnik, Jordi W J; Caravaca Puchades, Alejandro; Chiò, Adriano; Corcia, Philippe; Gal...espandi
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
Natural history of the revised ALS functional rating scale and its association with survival the PRECISION-ALS Extant Study.pdf

Accesso aperto

Dimensione 2.94 MB
Formato Adobe PDF
2.94 MB Adobe PDF Visualizza/Apri

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/2126631
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 4
  • Scopus 6
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 7
social impact