Echinochloa species are listed among the major weeds in rice worldwide. A greenhouse study was carried out on 80 accessions of Echinochloa collected in Italian rice fields to assess difference in response to azimsulfuron, bensulfuron-methyl, cyhalofop-butyl, molinate, propanil and quinclorac. Discriminant analysis pointed out that differences in herbicide sensitivity among accessions were of limited usefulness for accession classification. The results of this study suggest that the structure of Echinochloa populations in Italian rice fields, and the connected relationships with the effects of the use of herbicides are much more complex than previously thought.

Herbicide sensitivity of Echinochloa accessions in Italian rice fields

VIDOTTO, Francesco;TESIO, FRANCO;FERRERO, Aldo
2007-01-01

Abstract

Echinochloa species are listed among the major weeds in rice worldwide. A greenhouse study was carried out on 80 accessions of Echinochloa collected in Italian rice fields to assess difference in response to azimsulfuron, bensulfuron-methyl, cyhalofop-butyl, molinate, propanil and quinclorac. Discriminant analysis pointed out that differences in herbicide sensitivity among accessions were of limited usefulness for accession classification. The results of this study suggest that the structure of Echinochloa populations in Italian rice fields, and the connected relationships with the effects of the use of herbicides are much more complex than previously thought.
2007
26
285
293
Dose–response; Barnyardgrass; Baseline sensitivity; Discriminant analysis
F. Vidotto; F. Tesio; M. Tabacchi; A. Ferrero
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
vidotto_etal_2007.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 341.26 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
341.26 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/21756
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus 39
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 35
social impact