OBJECTIVE: Three main tests are commonly employed for the measurement of proteinuria: the dipstick test, the urinary protein/creatinine ratio (P/C) and the 24-h urine collection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between these methods, comparing linear regression and ROC curve data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 297 consecutive outpatients with different renal diseases were included in the study. Twenty-four-hour proteinuria was considered the reference test. RESULTS: A high degree of correlation was observed between all the tests (p<0.0001), the highest regression coefficient being between 24-h proteinuria and P/C (R=0.82), and the lowest between P/C and the dipstick test (R=0.72). The dipstick test failed to detect pathological proteinuria in 94 patients (31.6%). Therefore, in these subjects, the patterns of proteinuria were assessed by immunofixation and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) electrophoresis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data strongly support the use of urinary P/C for the detection of proteinuria, at least in nephrology units, where the prevalence of proteinuria is likely to be high.

Comparison between 24-h proteinuria, urinary protein/creatinine ratio and dipstick test in patients with nephropathy: patterns of proteinuria in dipstick-negative patients

SEGOLONI, Giuseppe;
2006-01-01

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Three main tests are commonly employed for the measurement of proteinuria: the dipstick test, the urinary protein/creatinine ratio (P/C) and the 24-h urine collection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the correlation between these methods, comparing linear regression and ROC curve data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 297 consecutive outpatients with different renal diseases were included in the study. Twenty-four-hour proteinuria was considered the reference test. RESULTS: A high degree of correlation was observed between all the tests (p<0.0001), the highest regression coefficient being between 24-h proteinuria and P/C (R=0.82), and the lowest between P/C and the dipstick test (R=0.72). The dipstick test failed to detect pathological proteinuria in 94 patients (31.6%). Therefore, in these subjects, the patterns of proteinuria were assessed by immunofixation and sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS) electrophoresis. CONCLUSIONS: Our data strongly support the use of urinary P/C for the detection of proteinuria, at least in nephrology units, where the prevalence of proteinuria is likely to be high.
2006
66
4
299
307
24-h proteinuria; Dipstick test; Laboratory methods; Nephropathy; Proteinuria; Urinary protein/creatinine ratio;
GAI M; MOTTA D; GIUNTI S; FOP F; MASINI S; MEZZA E; SEGOLONI GP; LANFRANCO G
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/32972
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 6
  • Scopus 22
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 21
social impact