AIM: The trend towards increasing prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antibiotic resistance may jeopardize the efficacy of most regimens. Culture of the bacterium, the useful method able to address therapy, is influenced by various factors. Thus, validation of the procedure is fundamental. Most studies have been carried out in microbiological settings, while only few have been conducted in clinical frames. We evaluated the accuracy of culture for detection of H. pylori in a clinical dedicated laboratory. METHODS: Forty-six patients (28 females, 18 males, mean age 56+/-4.7 years) were included. Thirty experienced failure to H. pylori eradication after at least 3 courses of treatment. The control group included 16 subjects suffering from gastroesophageal reflux disease and negativity for H. pylori infection. Diagnostic strategy was based on histology, culture testing, serology and 13C-urea breath test. A patient was considered infected if 2 tests were positive. A commercial culture medium in microaerophilic atmosphere was utilized. RESULTS: Out of 30 positive specimens, culture correctly identified 29. In 1 case, no growth of micro-organisms occurred. In the control group, bacterial culture accurately identified all negative samples. One of them indicated growth but neither aspect nor confirmation tests identified H. pylori. Sensitivity was 96.7%, specificity 100%, and accuracy 97.8%. Positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 94.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Culture of H. pylori is a feasible method and provides a good level of diagnostic accuracy even in a clinical setting by following international guidelines combined with training of specialized personnel.
How accurate is the culture of Helicobacter pylori in a clinical setting? An appraisal
SMEDILE, Antonina;PONZETTO, Antonio;SARACCO, Giorgio Maria;ABATE, Maria Lorena;FAGOONEE, SHARMILA;RIZZETTO, Mario
2005-01-01
Abstract
AIM: The trend towards increasing prevalence of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) antibiotic resistance may jeopardize the efficacy of most regimens. Culture of the bacterium, the useful method able to address therapy, is influenced by various factors. Thus, validation of the procedure is fundamental. Most studies have been carried out in microbiological settings, while only few have been conducted in clinical frames. We evaluated the accuracy of culture for detection of H. pylori in a clinical dedicated laboratory. METHODS: Forty-six patients (28 females, 18 males, mean age 56+/-4.7 years) were included. Thirty experienced failure to H. pylori eradication after at least 3 courses of treatment. The control group included 16 subjects suffering from gastroesophageal reflux disease and negativity for H. pylori infection. Diagnostic strategy was based on histology, culture testing, serology and 13C-urea breath test. A patient was considered infected if 2 tests were positive. A commercial culture medium in microaerophilic atmosphere was utilized. RESULTS: Out of 30 positive specimens, culture correctly identified 29. In 1 case, no growth of micro-organisms occurred. In the control group, bacterial culture accurately identified all negative samples. One of them indicated growth but neither aspect nor confirmation tests identified H. pylori. Sensitivity was 96.7%, specificity 100%, and accuracy 97.8%. Positive and negative predictive values were 100% and 94.1%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Culture of H. pylori is a feasible method and provides a good level of diagnostic accuracy even in a clinical setting by following international guidelines combined with training of specialized personnel.
I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.
