Background Following the discovery that mutant KRAS is associated with resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies, the tumours of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are now profi led for seven KRAS mutations before receiving cetuximab or panitumumab. However, most patients with KRAS wild-type tumours still do not respond. We studied the eff ect of other downstream mutations on the effi cacy of cetuximab in, to our knowledge, the largest cohort to date of patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy in the pre-KRAS selection era. Methods 1022 tumour DNA samples (73 from fresh-frozen and 949 from formalin-fi xed, paraffi n-embedded tissue) from patients treated with cetuximab between 2001 and 2008 were gathered from 11 centres in seven European countries. 773 primary tumour samples had suffi cient quality DNA and were included in mutation frequency analyses; mass spectrometry genotyping of tumour samples for KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA was done centrally. We analysed objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival in molecularly defi ned subgroups of the 649 chemotherapy-refractory patients treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Findings 40·0% (299/747) of the tumours harboured a KRAS mutation, 14·5% (108/743) harboured a PIK3CA mutation (of which 68·5% [74/108] were located in exon 9 and 20·4% [22/108] in exon 20), 4·7% (36/761) harboured a BRAF mutation, and 2·6% (17/644) harboured an NRAS mutation. KRAS mutants did not derive benefi t compared with wild types, with a response rate of 6·7% (17/253) versus 35·8% (126/352; odds ratio [OR] 0·13, 95% CI 0·07–0·22; p<0·0001), a median PFS of 12 weeks versus 24 weeks (hazard ratio [HR] 1·98, 1·66–2·36; p<0·0001), and a median overall survival of 32 weeks versus 50 weeks (1·75, 1·47–2·09; p<0·0001). In KRAS wild types, carriers of BRAF and NRAS mutations had a signifi cantly lower response rate than did BRAF and NRAS wild types, with a response rate of 8·3% (2/24) in carriers of BRAF mutations versus 38·0% in BRAF wild types (124/326; OR 0·15, 95% CI 0·02–0·51; p=0·0012); and 7·7% (1/13) in carriers of NRAS mutations versus 38·1% in NRAS wild types (110/289; OR 0·14, 0·007–0·70; p=0·013). PIK3CA exon 9 mutations had no eff ect, whereas exon 20 mutations were associated with a worse outcome compared with wild types, with a response rate of 0·0% (0/9) versus 36·8% (121/329; OR 0·00, 0·00–0·89; p=0·029), a median PFS of 11·5 weeks versus 24 weeks (HR 2·52, 1·33–4·78; p=0·013), and a median overall survival of 34 weeks versus 51 weeks (3·29, 1·60–6·74; p=0·0057). Multivariate analysis and conditional inference trees confi rmed that, if KRAS is not mutated, assessing BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA exon 20 mutations (in that order) gives additional information about outcome. Objective response rates in our series were 24·4% in the unselected population, 36·3% in the KRAS wild-type selected population, and 41·2% in the KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA exon 20 wild-type population. Interpretation While confi rming the negative eff ect of KRAS mutations on outcome after cetuximab, we show that BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA exon 20 mutations are signifi cantly associated with a low response rate. Objective response rates could be improved by additional genotyping of BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA exon 20 mutations in a KRAS wild-type population.

Effects of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS and PIK3CA mutations on the efficacy of cetuximab plus chemotherapy in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer: a retrospective population-based Consortium analysis

MARTINI, MIriam;BARDELLI, Alberto;
2010

Abstract

Background Following the discovery that mutant KRAS is associated with resistance to anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) antibodies, the tumours of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer are now profi led for seven KRAS mutations before receiving cetuximab or panitumumab. However, most patients with KRAS wild-type tumours still do not respond. We studied the eff ect of other downstream mutations on the effi cacy of cetuximab in, to our knowledge, the largest cohort to date of patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy in the pre-KRAS selection era. Methods 1022 tumour DNA samples (73 from fresh-frozen and 949 from formalin-fi xed, paraffi n-embedded tissue) from patients treated with cetuximab between 2001 and 2008 were gathered from 11 centres in seven European countries. 773 primary tumour samples had suffi cient quality DNA and were included in mutation frequency analyses; mass spectrometry genotyping of tumour samples for KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA was done centrally. We analysed objective response, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival in molecularly defi ned subgroups of the 649 chemotherapy-refractory patients treated with cetuximab plus chemotherapy. Findings 40·0% (299/747) of the tumours harboured a KRAS mutation, 14·5% (108/743) harboured a PIK3CA mutation (of which 68·5% [74/108] were located in exon 9 and 20·4% [22/108] in exon 20), 4·7% (36/761) harboured a BRAF mutation, and 2·6% (17/644) harboured an NRAS mutation. KRAS mutants did not derive benefi t compared with wild types, with a response rate of 6·7% (17/253) versus 35·8% (126/352; odds ratio [OR] 0·13, 95% CI 0·07–0·22; p<0·0001), a median PFS of 12 weeks versus 24 weeks (hazard ratio [HR] 1·98, 1·66–2·36; p<0·0001), and a median overall survival of 32 weeks versus 50 weeks (1·75, 1·47–2·09; p<0·0001). In KRAS wild types, carriers of BRAF and NRAS mutations had a signifi cantly lower response rate than did BRAF and NRAS wild types, with a response rate of 8·3% (2/24) in carriers of BRAF mutations versus 38·0% in BRAF wild types (124/326; OR 0·15, 95% CI 0·02–0·51; p=0·0012); and 7·7% (1/13) in carriers of NRAS mutations versus 38·1% in NRAS wild types (110/289; OR 0·14, 0·007–0·70; p=0·013). PIK3CA exon 9 mutations had no eff ect, whereas exon 20 mutations were associated with a worse outcome compared with wild types, with a response rate of 0·0% (0/9) versus 36·8% (121/329; OR 0·00, 0·00–0·89; p=0·029), a median PFS of 11·5 weeks versus 24 weeks (HR 2·52, 1·33–4·78; p=0·013), and a median overall survival of 34 weeks versus 51 weeks (3·29, 1·60–6·74; p=0·0057). Multivariate analysis and conditional inference trees confi rmed that, if KRAS is not mutated, assessing BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA exon 20 mutations (in that order) gives additional information about outcome. Objective response rates in our series were 24·4% in the unselected population, 36·3% in the KRAS wild-type selected population, and 41·2% in the KRAS, BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA exon 20 wild-type population. Interpretation While confi rming the negative eff ect of KRAS mutations on outcome after cetuximab, we show that BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA exon 20 mutations are signifi cantly associated with a low response rate. Objective response rates could be improved by additional genotyping of BRAF, NRAS, and PIK3CA exon 20 mutations in a KRAS wild-type population.
11
8
753
762
De Roock W; Claes B; Bernasconi D; De Schutter J; Biesmans B; Fountzilas G; Kalogeras KT; Kotoula V; Papamichael D; Laurent-Puig P; Penault-Llorca F; Rougier P; Vincenzi B; Santini D; Tonini G; Cappuzzo F; Frattini M; Molinari F; Saletti P; De Dosso S; Martini M; Bardelli A; Siena S; Sartore-Bianchi A; Tabernero J; Macarulla T; Di Fiore F; Gangloff AO; Ciardiello F; Pfeiffer P; Qvortrup C; Hansen TP; Van Cutsem E; Piessevaux H; Lambrechts D; Delorenzi M; Tejpar S
File in questo prodotto:
File Dimensione Formato  
2010-Effects of KRAS BRAF NRAS.pdf

Accesso riservato

Tipo di file: POSTPRINT (VERSIONE FINALE DELL’AUTORE)
Dimensione 383.65 kB
Formato Adobe PDF
383.65 kB Adobe PDF   Visualizza/Apri   Richiedi una copia

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/79839
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? 806
  • Scopus 1675
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? 26
social impact