Exogenous or endogenous glucocorticoid (GC) excess is an established cause of osteoporosis and fractures. As many as 50% of patients with Cushing’s syndrome suffer from osteoporosis. It is presently unknown if Cushing’s disease (CD) sustained by a pituitary ACTH-producing adenoma and adrenal-dependent Cushing’s syndrome (ACS) sustained by an adrenocortical adenoma have a different potential of inducing osteopenia. Aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze bone mineral density (BMD) in 26 patients with CD (4 men, 22 women, aged 14-79 years), 12 patients with ACS (4 men, 8 women, aged 32-79 years) and 38 healthy subjects carefully matched for sex, age and body mass index (BMI). Measurement of BMD was performed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using the Hologic QDR 4500 W instrument. Data were analyzed using absolute BMD values (g/cm2), t-score and z-score referred to the manufacturer’s normative data for the lumbar spine and to the NHANES III dataset for the hip. The patients with CD and ACS were comparable for age, BMI, estimated duration of disease, urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels, midnight serum cortisol and gonadal function. Lumbar DXA values were significantly different among the three groups. They were more reduced in patients with ACS (BMD, 0.76 ± 0.03 g/cm2; t-score, -2.78 ± 0.28; z-score, -2.25 ± 0.30) while patients with CD (BMD, 0.87 ± 0.02 g/cm2; t-score, -1.74 ± 0.24; z-score, -0.99 ± 0.32) showed DXA values between the first group and controls (BMD, 1.02 ± 0.02 g/cm2; t-score, -0.35 ± 0.19; z-score, 0.33 ± 0.16). The difference in BMD at the spine remained statistically significant (p=0.04) after adjustment for the non-significant differences in age, UFC and fat mass between CD and ACS. Conversely, femoral DXA values were not significantly different between patients with ACS and CD, even if they were reduced with respect to controls. In patients with ACS, we observed a reduction of DHEA-S levels, expressed as standard score (z-score) to circumvent the pronounced effect of gender and age on such hormone (DHEA-S z-score: ACS -0.88 ± 1.4 vs. CD 2.25 ± 2.35, p=0.0001). DHEA-S z-score values were significantly correlated with lumbar BMD (r=0.41, p=0.02) and femoral BMD (r=0.43, p=0.01). DHEA-S z-score values were also significantly correlated with osteocalcin levels (r=0.45, p=0.01). Our data suggest that bone loss is greater in ACS than in CD. A plausible explanation comes from the reduced DHEA-S level in ACS since DHEA-S has well known anabolic actions on bone. However, this hypothesis needs to be confirmed in large, prospective series of patients with Cushing’s syndrome of different etiology.

Bone loss is more severe in primary adrenal than in pituitary-dependent Cushing's syndrome.

MINETTO, Marco Alessandro;REIMONDO, Giuseppe Matteo;TERZOLO, Massimo;ANGELI, Alberto
2004-01-01

Abstract

Exogenous or endogenous glucocorticoid (GC) excess is an established cause of osteoporosis and fractures. As many as 50% of patients with Cushing’s syndrome suffer from osteoporosis. It is presently unknown if Cushing’s disease (CD) sustained by a pituitary ACTH-producing adenoma and adrenal-dependent Cushing’s syndrome (ACS) sustained by an adrenocortical adenoma have a different potential of inducing osteopenia. Aim of the present study was to retrospectively analyze bone mineral density (BMD) in 26 patients with CD (4 men, 22 women, aged 14-79 years), 12 patients with ACS (4 men, 8 women, aged 32-79 years) and 38 healthy subjects carefully matched for sex, age and body mass index (BMI). Measurement of BMD was performed by dual energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) using the Hologic QDR 4500 W instrument. Data were analyzed using absolute BMD values (g/cm2), t-score and z-score referred to the manufacturer’s normative data for the lumbar spine and to the NHANES III dataset for the hip. The patients with CD and ACS were comparable for age, BMI, estimated duration of disease, urinary free cortisol (UFC) levels, midnight serum cortisol and gonadal function. Lumbar DXA values were significantly different among the three groups. They were more reduced in patients with ACS (BMD, 0.76 ± 0.03 g/cm2; t-score, -2.78 ± 0.28; z-score, -2.25 ± 0.30) while patients with CD (BMD, 0.87 ± 0.02 g/cm2; t-score, -1.74 ± 0.24; z-score, -0.99 ± 0.32) showed DXA values between the first group and controls (BMD, 1.02 ± 0.02 g/cm2; t-score, -0.35 ± 0.19; z-score, 0.33 ± 0.16). The difference in BMD at the spine remained statistically significant (p=0.04) after adjustment for the non-significant differences in age, UFC and fat mass between CD and ACS. Conversely, femoral DXA values were not significantly different between patients with ACS and CD, even if they were reduced with respect to controls. In patients with ACS, we observed a reduction of DHEA-S levels, expressed as standard score (z-score) to circumvent the pronounced effect of gender and age on such hormone (DHEA-S z-score: ACS -0.88 ± 1.4 vs. CD 2.25 ± 2.35, p=0.0001). DHEA-S z-score values were significantly correlated with lumbar BMD (r=0.41, p=0.02) and femoral BMD (r=0.43, p=0.01). DHEA-S z-score values were also significantly correlated with osteocalcin levels (r=0.45, p=0.01). Our data suggest that bone loss is greater in ACS than in CD. A plausible explanation comes from the reduced DHEA-S level in ACS since DHEA-S has well known anabolic actions on bone. However, this hypothesis needs to be confirmed in large, prospective series of patients with Cushing’s syndrome of different etiology.
2004
26th Annual Meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research
Seattle, USA
October 1-5, 2004
19
S436
S436
Minetto M; Reimondo G; Osella G; Ventura M; Dovio A; Terzolo M; Angeli A
File in questo prodotto:
Non ci sono file associati a questo prodotto.

I documenti in IRIS sono protetti da copyright e tutti i diritti sono riservati, salvo diversa indicazione.

Utilizza questo identificativo per citare o creare un link a questo documento: https://hdl.handle.net/2318/80541
Citazioni
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.pmc??? ND
  • Scopus ND
  • ???jsp.display-item.citation.isi??? ND
social impact